StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

U.S. Space Program vs. Japan Space Program - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
In the early periods of space exploration, most countries were unwilling or lacked the ability to explore the resources required for large scale national space programs. In fact, during this period only the US and the Soviet Union supported these kinds of programs. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
U.S. Space Program vs. Japan Space Program
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "U.S. Space Program vs. Japan Space Program"

U.S. Space Program vs. Japan Space Program In the early periods of space exploration, most countries were unwilling or lackedthe ability to explore the resources required for large scale national space programs. In fact, during this period only the US and the Soviet Union supported these kinds of programs. Subsequently, both countries grew stronger in space exploration and became unchallenged pre-eminence in space activities and technologies. However, in recent years, the international interest and activities in space exploration has grown tremendously and many countries have started taking part in the same. This change of heart by most countries towards space exploration has been brought about by many factors including maturation of industries, markets for communications satellites and transferable space technologies. In addition, space development and assured access to space have become vital factors for high technology growth and national security. With these benefits in mind, many countries have fostered space programs which are promising and successful. A good example of such a country is Japan whose space program grew in less than 20 years from the launch of its first satellite in 1970 to participation in the international space station freedom project. In comparison to US space program, Japan’s space program has used US technical capabilities as a benchmark for its own capabilities thus causing a conflict in program philosophy between them and the United States. Therefore, since operational philosophies and styles of the two countries’ space programs are distinct, their comparison is important as can give insight into their relative strengths and weaknesses as well as their long term objectives and strategies. United States The United States space program began in 1958 with the launch of its scientific satellite explorer. Towards the end of that year, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) whose purpose was to direct the nation’s civilian activities in space was formed. For almost a decade, US space program concentrated on developing satellite and launching vehicle technologies, supporting solar system research and developing manned spaceflight capabilities. The launch technology efforts led to creation of the early models of the Titan, Atlas and Delta launch vehicles. The program also carried out unmanned research missions throughout the solar system such as probes to the sun, Venus, Moon and Mars. During 1970s, the United States carried out further manned missions to the moon and launched the Skylab station program. In 1980s, the program began developing the international space station freedom. In the US, the space activities are managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Department of Defense (DOD) which have different roles, styles and responsibilities. NASA emphasize on peaceful exploration and development of space whereas DOD is concerned with national defense and security. It is important to note that although the two organizations have different responsibilities, they at times work together. For instance during the National Aerospace Plane (NASP) project they worked together. The US space programs are also funded by the government through the two organizations which are the administrators and project managers of space exploration (Wells and Hastings 15). The space programs of the United States usually revolve around increasing human exploration of the space, supporting national security, rejuvenating space science and research, developing higher capacity and cultivating the involvement of private sector into the space programs. Generally, the United States’ space program is more concerned in maintaining its status as the leading world power in space exploration and development (Wells and Hastings 22). The United States’ entrance into space exploration was influenced or driven with the need to be a super power and establish superior military space systems, and the race to reach the moon first before Soviet Union (Wells and Hastings 12). Japan The Japanese space program started in 1955 with the launch of a small solid sounding rocket (pencil rocket) by a group of scientists at the University of Tokyo. The group was headed by a student who studied medical technology in the US but changed his career to rocket technology upon arriving in Japan. Within ten years, the Japan’s space activities were conducted by national space activities council (NSAC), institute of space and aeronautical science (university of Tokyo) and national space development centre (NSDC). However, due to the country’s slow rate space technology development, the government formed the SAC in 1968 and the national space development agency (NASDA) in 1969 to replace NSAC and NSDC. Under these two organizations, Japan became the fourth country in the world to place a satellite (Osumi) in the orbit (Langer, 3). Currently, Japanese space activities are also managed by two organizations; The National Space Development Agency (NASDA) and the Institute for Space and Astronautical Sciences (ISAS) both of which operate under the policy guidance of the SAC. Unlike the US, none of the organizations of the Japan are concerned with the defense applications. They are oriented to peaceful developments and explorations. NASDA develops application satellites, launch vehicles, acquire and utilize system data whereas ISAS is responsible for developing and launching scientific satellites as well as promoting and supporting space science fields. The two organizations are completely independent in terms of management, activities and funding (Wells and Hastings 19). In terms of funding, the Japanese space activities are funded from the civilian sector of the national budget. Japanese space activities are essentially civilians’ efforts; they are completely operated from the military establishment and the researches are carried out in broad daylight by civilian personnel. The activities are mostly associated with academic institutions (Langer, 5). The goals of the Japanese space program are categorized into two groups- short term and long term. The short term goal is to increase the scope, capabilities and commercial utility of the program whereas the long term goal is to attain self sufficiency and develop a state of privatization (Langer, 7). Since its creation the activities of the Japanese space program have been focused on the developing space technologies and pursuing autonomy in space. Current initiatives that have resulted from the objective are development efforts for satellite technologies and launch of world class vehicles (Wells and Hastings 10). Conclusion Although Japan’s space program has progressed very first, it no where close to match that of the US. The United States of America has grown stronger over years and proved that it will still remain to be the strongest leader in space exploration. Thus, many countries including Japan will always use as a benchmark for their programs. Work cited Damon R. Wells and Daniel E. Hastings. The US and Japanese Space Programs: A Comparative Study of Goals and Capabilities. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, 1992. Paul F. Langer. The Japanese Space Program: Political and social implications the Rand. Corporation, Santa Monica: California, 1968. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“U.S. Space Program vs. Japan Space Program Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1420153-us-vs-japan
(U.S. Space Program Vs. Japan Space Program Essay)
https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1420153-us-vs-japan.
“U.S. Space Program Vs. Japan Space Program Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/environmental-studies/1420153-us-vs-japan.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF U.S. Space Program vs. Japan Space Program

The Biography of a Military Strategist

He saw the birth of the space program and supported the idea.... hellip; The author states that the US government committed billions of dollars to the program.... When a section of the public and economists questioned the program, Powell was in defense of the military spy station.... While Hitler, Mussolini, and japan came out openly as rogue leaders and state, we sat back and watched.... “The Marshall Plan is a big boost in the recovery of Western Europe and japan in the post-war period....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

International Studies 2007

Well, I have been eternally rapt by nature and that is why admission to the 2007 International Studies program in Japan is vital to my career as a designer. Letter of Intent International Studies 2007 Studying design in New York has given me two wonderful opportunities.... Well, I have been eternally rapt by nature and that is why admission to the 2007 International Studies program in Japan is vital to my career as a designer.... he lure of the opportunity to study in Japan does not overshadow my obligations to the program....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

There's No Place Like Home - on Moon

Apollo program proved that manned mission to moon is very much feasible but the rock and dirt samples brought back were extremely low in lighter elements required for supporting life.... Mining helium-3, a potential rich source of energy (could be used in futuristic fusion reactors on Earth that would generate electricity without producing nuclear waste) and harnessing it back to Earth would be a key priority in the moon exploration program.... Japan wants to help build a lunar base and populate it with advanced versions of today's humanoid robots by around 2025, according to the head of the nation's space agency....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

International Space Station

NASA had originally scheduled participating in ISS program until 2015, but with loss of STS-107, President Bush declared that the shuttle would be retired by 2010, which meant no support service for ISS.... The paper 'International space Station' focuses on 15 nations which are responsible for building a large inhabited Earth satellite, which is called International space Station (ISS).... The participants include Japan, Brazil and member nations of the European space Agency....
1 Pages (250 words) Case Study

Systems Engineering in International Space Station

A major feature or rather a major leap taken towards such progression can be identified as the space shuttle programs launched by different nations conducting rigorous and critical experiments in the Earth's orbit.... hellip; To be mentioned in this regard, these space shuttle programmes involve huge financial costs, often demanding collaborative efforts from numerous funding sources.... One such initiative was taken by the US in 1998, when it To be mentioned in this regard, these space shuttle programmes involve huge financial costs, often demanding collaborative efforts from numerous funding sources....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

A Comparative Analysis of Waste Management in Japan and the US

"A Comparative Analysis of Waste Management in japan and the US " compares and contrast waste management systems between japan and the United States.... The discourse proffers the strengths and weaknesses of both systems and suggests measures for improvement, as needed....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

Technology Transfer in the Spacecraft Sector of the Aeronautical Industry

hellip; Technology transfer decreases the costs and time allocated with this process as it makes use of technology already been perfected by a different country's space agency.... In the United Kingdom, the Science and Technology Facilities Council has been chosen to facilitate the transfer of technology from the European space agency (ESA).... (space technology transfer handled by SFTC).... he Small Spacecraft Initiative was started in 1994 by The Office of Advanced Concepts and Technology's (OACT) Spacecraft and Remote Sensing division to implement a new approach to technology integration and to reduce the time and cost taken to develop space missions for scientific and commercial applications (Technology)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Proposal

Aircraft Structural Design: Ageing Aircraft Program

"Aircraft Structural Design: Ageing Aircraft program" paper states that considering the enormous cost of acquiring a new aircraft, alongside the existing limited reliable manufacturer around the world, the aging aircraft need be maintained in service for a period longer than expected....
15 Pages (3750 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us