StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

In Whose Jurisdiction Is the Creation of a Judicial Precedent - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper “In Whose Jurisdiction Is the Creation of a Judicial Precedent?” illuminates how the case law is developing in different judicial instances - the court of appeal, the Supreme Court, the judicial court of the EU, which precedents are not applicable as sources of law in the case law etc…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
In Whose Jurisdiction Is the Creation of a Judicial Precedent
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "In Whose Jurisdiction Is the Creation of a Judicial Precedent"

LAW MAKING Question 1: Definitions (a). Act of parliament Acts of parliament are statutory laws made by parliament in its legislative role. Their legislation involves a process in which laws are proposed before the parliament as bills, are debated, and eventually assented to by the queen. Once approved by the queen, a proposed bill becomes law and is superior to common law. An example of acts of parliament is the “freedom of information act” which was proposed to parliament and assented to in 2000 (Harris, 2007, p. 190). (b). Delegated legislation Delegated legislation refers to laws made by a body or an entity other than the parliament. The body must however derive its legislative authority from parliament through an act of parliament known as parent act. An example of a delegated legislation is a set of city bylaws formulated by local authorities. The local authorities are authorized by parliament to make byelaws for regulations in their council’s jurisdictions (W100, 2011, p. 115). (c). Supreme Court and its functions The Supreme Court is the highest court in the judicial structure. Its functions include hearing appellate cases from the court of appeal. Its jurisdiction also extends to appeals from the high court and covers both civil and criminal cases (W100, 2011, p. 149). (d). The golden rule The golden rule is a statutory interpretation rule in which the courts deviate from literal meaning of words of a statute to ensure that interpretation of the statute is reasonable and consistent. The case of Lewis v Hilaire et al 1970 15 WIR 192 is an example of an application of the golden rule (Antoine, 2008, 252). (e). Directive A directive is an order from an international body to its member countries requiring the members to adjust their domestic laws. Working time directive is an example of a directive from the European Union (W100, 2011, p., 226). Question 2: Advantages and disadvantages of law making through Westminster parliament Legislations made through the Westminster parliament, the parliamentary system that exist in Britain, has a number of advantages. The parliament’s House of Commons is composed of elected members from all parts of the country, a feature that makes its legislative process representative of the people’s opinions. This makes parliamentary legislation a democratic process because it gives people an opportunity in making law making. The sources of parliamentary legislations, which include bills from members of parliament also means that citizens have an avenue of instituting legislations through their members of parliament in private member bills. Similarly, citizen’s opinions can be used to draft ‘government-sponsored’ bills. Parliamentary legislation is therefore a democratic process (Gray, 2004, p. 30; W100, 2011, p., 104). Parliamentary legislation is also flexible with respect to time. This is because a legislative process can be instituted at any time as opposed to other sources of legislations that depends on emergence of circumstances. Judicial legislations, for instance, relies on existence of a case in court before a principle can be laid. Parliamentary legislation can however be instituted at any time by tabling of a bill because the process depends on the life of the parliament and not a phenomenon. Another advantage of the parliamentary legislation is that its process is formally outlined with “checks and balances to ensure that the law is appropriate” (Gray, 2004, p. 30). A bill is particularly scrutinized and debated upon by members of both houses, House of Commons and House of Lords to ensure appropriateness before it is passed into law (Gray, 2004, p. 30) Legislations made through the Westminster parliamentary process also exhibit a number of disadvantages. The process is subject to political influence that arises from the fact that political parties’ manifestos are acceptable sources of bills for parliamentary legislation (W100, 2011, p., 92). The party with majority representation in parliament can therefore easily influence the content of the bill, its debate, and the final voting for passing it into law. This can lead to biasness and improper legislation due to political differences among political parties in the house (Gray, 2004, p. 30). Acts of parliament are also difficult to understand because of the terms and jargons used. This makes it difficult for laypersons to understand the contents of the acts. The major disadvantage of parliamentary legislation is however, the involved complexity of the legislation process and the long time that is required for a bill to pass into law. There are laid down procedures that must be followed within stipulated periods. A bill must for example be tabled in parliament, debated on, subjected to a select committee before a final approval by both houses and the royal assent (Gray, , p. 29, 30). A bill has to pass through a number of formal procedures before it becomes law. The first stage of a bill in parliament is the first reading in which the title of the bill is read to members who vote on the bill. If the bill is approved, it is passes to second reading stage at which members of the house debate and vote. A vote for the bill moves it to the committee stage at which few members of the house are selected to further review the bill. Upon completion of its duty, the committee brings back the bill to the house’s reporting stage at which members reviews the committee’s recommendations and makes necessary amendments. The bill is then passed to the third reading at which a final vote by the house is conducted. If approved, the bill is passed to the other house for consideration and if approved, is taken for royal assent after which it becomes law (Gray, 2004, p. 29; W100, 2011, p., 107, 108). Question 3: The role of the judiciary in the law making process The interpretation role of the judiciary contributes to law making through establishment of judicial precedents and interpretation of statutes. Precedents A judicial precedent is a principle of judgement by a court that has been recognized as an authority in making judgements in similar cases. The doctrine of ‘stare decisis’ that binds future judgements to the the laid down principles gives precedents an authority of law. Establishment of a principle is therefore an equivalent formulation of law. Based on the principle of ‘stare decisis,’ decisions by judges of a court are bound by interpretations of ‘ratio decidendi’ of judgements by superior courts. Similarly, precedents set in the court of appeal bind all judges of the court and those of lower courts. The doctrine of judicial precedents within the court of appeal is however exempted under a number of circumstances (W100, 2011, p. 163). Two precedents, made in the court of appeal, that are in conflict are not binding to a court of appeal judge. The judge can therefore establish a new precedent or apply a different but appropriate precedent. Similarly, a court of appeal decision that has been overruled by the Supreme Court ceases to bind. Precedents that are made in ignorance of some rule of law, whether a statue or a precedent, as well as those that conflict the judicial court of the European Union are not applicable as sources of law under case law. A judge can also deviate from an existing precedent to establish a new principle of law in the form of an overruling precedent or a distinguishing precedent (W100, 2011, p., 168). Establishing an overruling precedent involves abolishing an existing precedent and substituting it with a new one. This can only be done by a higher court than the one that set the previous principle. An overruling precedent therefore improves the basis of law by striking out inappropriate principles to the rule of law and the doctrine of natural justice. This is because an overruling precedent can only be established on grounds that the existing one had fault or undermined justice. A principle of law can also be established through distinguishing precedent if a judge can determine difference in facts between a case at hand and the case upon which an existing precedent was developed. Both the old and the new precedents becomes applicable (W100, 2011, p., 170, 171). Interpretation off statutes The role of judges in interpretation of legislation is extended to provision of appropriate meaning to a statute, especially when the statute is likely to fail in achieving its objective. Some of the rules of interpretation include the “literal rule,” “the golden rule” and the “mischief rule” (Harris, 2007, p. 212). In applying the literal rule, the courts use the literal meaning of the words of the statute. There are however instances in which application of the literal rule to interpreting a statute may not yield justice in a case. This occurs when the statute to be applied is “ambiguous or obscure, or leads to absurdity” (Harris, 2007, p. 211). The literal rule may also be deviated from if it can prompt inconsistency in administration of justice. Under the golden rule, a judge develops an interpretation that that eliminates “absurdity or inconsistency” that would be associated with the literal rule. The mischief rule is on the other hand applied in cases where application of the literal meaning of the words of the statue may not remedy a mischief that the statue aimed at resolving. The golden and the literal rule therefore establish principles of law that statutes had failed to identify. The judges therefore make laws by establishing principles through precedents and interpretation of statutes (Harris, 2007, p. 212). Reference list Antoine, R. (2008). Commonwealth Caribbean Law And Legal Systems. Oxon, UK: Routledge Gray, D. (2004). Public services (uniformed). Oxford, UK: Heinemann Harris, P. (2007). An Introduction to Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press W100. (2011). W100 rules, rights and justice: An introduction to law. London, UK: Open university Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Law Making Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Law Making Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1445417-law-making
(Law Making Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Law Making Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1445417-law-making.
“Law Making Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1445417-law-making.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF In Whose Jurisdiction Is the Creation of a Judicial Precedent

The Principle of Binding Precedent

The principle of binding precedent First name, last name Subject Professor Submission Date The principle of binding precedent In the practice of Common Law, a Binding Precedence, also known as a Mandatory Authority or a Binding Authority is a decision, usually made by a superior court or a court of the same level as the court hearing the latter case that must be followed.... hellip; The lower court has in a majority of cases, no option but to abide by a Binding precedent, regardless of whether or not the judge or the jury sitting on the matter personally agrees with the legal reasoning1....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

System of Precedence in Judiciary Law

nbsp;A precedent as utilized in the legal lexicon is a case that creates a set of legal guidelines based on a specific set of facts.... When the facts are unique and have not previously been examined in a court of law, a precedent is set.... nbsp;The term Stare decisis translates to 'Let the decision stand' and it is the judicial rule that dictates that as long as a precedent is binding, it must be followed.... For a precedent to be utilized, it has to be binding....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent

The present study is a work on particular jurisprudence since it seeks the correct positioning of the doctrine of judicial precedent within the English legal system.... Many a legal theorists and commentators have agreed upon the view that the sophistication of the English legal system cannot be understood without grasping the centrality of the doctrine of judicial precedent in it.... The doctrine of judicial precedent has undergone profound transformations from Eighteenth century onwards in accordance with the changing world....
26 Pages (6500 words) Thesis

The Docterine of Precedent: Case Law and Legislation

Where the reason for the creation of the law ceases, the law itself ceases to exist.... nbsp; Lord Denning in the above passage is not opposed to the application of the doctrine of precedent.... In everyday life, we tend to consider precedent, or our past experiences, to help us decide and create rules, whether we do so knowingly or unknowingly.... As such, precedent creates certainty and stability.... In sitting in a case, a judge analyzes similar cases and if the facts and the laws are alike, the judge will have to follow the said precedent laid down by the court....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

Effectiveness of International Criminal Law Demands Clarity in Respect of the Law and Jurisdiction

The major sources of ICL are identified to be treaties, Customary International Law (CIL), general principle of law, judicial decisions and learned writing.... A Critical Understanding of the Sources Of International Criminal Law and the Substantive Rules of Law, and Their Scope And Operation in Establishing Liability For Crimes That Transcend Sovereign jurisdiction 6 The Development and Implementation of International Law Implemented… by Both National and International Criminal Courts and Evaluation of the Relationship Between National Jurisdictions With Particular Reference to Models of Practice 9 Critical Understanding of the Principles and Values of International Law, Sources of International Law and International criminal law (ICL) is not an old maxim....
15 Pages (3750 words) Coursework

The Case Marbury V. Madison

The court case hence resulted to the Judiciary, Legislative & Executive branches of the government is on an evener power basis ultimately setting the precedent for an infinite number of future historic decisions (Marbury versus Madison, 1803)....  This essay discusses the judicial review arguments used in Marbury v.... Thus, this historic case created the concept of judicial Review or the capability of the Judiciary declaring a law unconstitutional....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Stare Decisis and the Principle of Precedent

Gur-Arie highlights that though judicial independence was originally intended in order to have courts and judges who settle disputes impartially regardless of potential, proffers, and real favors.... However, the United States provisions promote the judiciary's democratic control on one hand while promoting judicial independence on the other.... This is evident in the present procedures for judicial budgeting that leaves the courts and judges under the oversight and slight control from the executive and the legislature....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

Sources of English Law

In other words, the concept of precedent is the propelling force of the Common Law.... The author outlines sources of English law, its development, parliamentary acts, judicial precedents, the classification.... Countries like Hong Kong, whose legal tradition can be traced to English Law, still conform to the Common Law in their legal structures and systems....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us