StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Asylum Rights in International Law - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The right of asylum, otherwise known as political asylum, relates to an individual rejected by their own country being protected by another sovereign authority. The institution of asylum dates from the same time with the start of civilization…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.5% of users find it useful
Asylum Rights in International Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Asylum Rights in International Law"

? Asylum Rights in International Law The right of asylum, otherwise known as political asylum, relates to an individual rejected by their own country being protected by another sovereign authority. The institution of asylum dates from the same time with the start of civilization. It is an international concept that still has not received apt considerations in terms of the inalienable rights in the international human rights charter. There exist setbacks in terms of interpretation where many states argue that they cannot put their sovereignty to test due to the international human rights stipulations. Asylum develops from persecution and many different forms of persecution can lead to application of asylum. There are specific persecutions that lead to an individual gaining the refugee status. Persecution on the basis of gender practices has been common in the recent years. This has advanced the claims for asylum among many people across the world. Persecution ranges on different factors which can include gender, religion and social status. An additional note is that the meaning of persecution may also comprise discrimination of persons opposing colonialism. Many states have incorporated their immigrant requirements and asylum allowance into the same legal structure. The decision of a granting a persecuted individual or a refugee asylum depends on the state. This paper seeks to analyze the status of asylum within international human rights law. It also discusses the existing tensions between asylum, human rights and sovereignty. The features of asylum rights are clearly spelt in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It declares categorically that every individual has a right to freedom of residence and freedom within the borders of each country. In fact, it maintains, under article 13, that every individual has the right to leave and return to any state including their own. In article 14 of the UDHR every person has right to seek and enjoy asylum to any countries after being persecuted (Weissbrodt & Vega, 2007 p16). The conditions for this are that this right may not be brought into play in instances of prosecutions legitimately coming from non-political crimes. This right cannot be referred to if the person is facing persecution from their country due to acts that are contrary to the principles and purposes of the United Nations. The rights to asylum therefore, are well spelt out and cannot be enjoyed at the expense of a country’s security and derogation of the international law. It is apt to discuss the description and status of refugees who are different form asylum seekers. On the contrary, human rights work brings about challenges for asylum supporters. This field of international human rights has witness intense reforms since the mid twentieth century. This was the time when the principle normative frame for refugees was recognized. The gender based approach on understanding the fundamental rights has changed what counts as rights violation. This is on a scope that the violations are not only viewed as private or stately induced but political violations. Clearly this informs the description of asylum as political based (Gibney, 2005 p74). International human rights subject has thus transformed to incorporate issues linked to gender-based public issues, sexuality and sexual orientation. International human rights are viewed on grounds of development, globalization and health. Home displacement has emerges as a key area of concern, shifting the dominance of a country’s sovereignty as a rationalization for non-involvement. These progress challenges asylum advocates to modernize the initial notions in refugee protection. This should be done while keeping grip of the old internationalist system in a situation where exilic defense of asylum seekers is in challenges. In international law, all contracting states to the United Nations should give sympathetic consideration to individuals who are unable to get travel documents from their countries. Under article 31, all these people without documents are protected so long as they avail themselves to the authorities. They should also show a good cause for seeking the illegal entry (Goudapell & Raulus, 2011 p112). The host countries should afford the refugees all the facilities and amenities and no restrictions should be imposed. From these provisions it is clear that the international puts a clear difference from a refugee and asylum seeker. The story of Edward Snowden is a known example of how different states contradict the international law on asylum. Snowden was held in a transit zone of a Moscow airport where he had to fill numerous applications. His passport was revoked by the country of his origin hence he had to seek asylum to any country around the world. He claimed that the United States had prompted this on claims that he had intended to have a home outside of the United States. The Russian administration, on the other hand, maintained that he could only stay there after he shuns the United States. India, Brazil and Poland rejected his application for asylum. Norway, Ecuador and Ireland accepted his application on condition that he physically enters their soil to fill the political asylum application. The rest of the many countries initiated the wait and see policy since they did not wish to antagonize the United States. This is an example of a test on international law and how asylum affects its implementation. In this example, the United States is on the wrong side of interpretation of international law and asylum. This is a country viewed as the ideal face of democracy and strong institutions of government. However, it does not give Snowden his full rights and freedoms. India also revoked Snowden’s application for asylum. It is clear that this India acted out of its own sovereignty as a state. This also characterizes its foreign policy as weak. Snowden did not reveal something new since these practices contradicting international law are engaged even by the weakest governments. Most countries do not preserve the majesty of international rule of law. The respect and dignity of international law are at most times ignored on claims of safeguarding a country’s sovereignty. Politics is the central issue in Snowden's case. International law permits him to apply anyplace he wishes to, but the decision to accept him solely rests on the individual country. Due to the bilateral ties these countries have with the United States, they are not ready to jeopardize their transactions and relations. Across time there have been similar instances where people are confined in such transit zones. Another transit zone dweller is Mehran Karimi Nasseri, an Iranian refugee. He remained in France’s Charles de Gaulle airport for close to seventeen years. When a refugee enters into a transit zone, they are considered as not present. From this most of the countries ward off the opportunity of protecting them as required by international law. This has created new policies by many countries to accommodate more refugees in transit zones. Conversely, the European Court of Human Rights abandoned this point as it is in violation of human rights nuances and norms. These countries have expanded their transit zones but still have the power and authority to detain and deport the refugees to their origins. However, legal issues are a challenge to the jurisdictional and transactional issues of asylum. The legal issues are mainly on the condition of a transit-zone as perched areas within an airport and flexible rights of the national systems in such situations. Interestingly a transit zone is on a specific territory in which it is placed. It is not probable that it is considered not to be a part of the state. One key characteristic is that the sates establish these zones to counter entitlements and legal rights of individuals in transit. Most states do not uphold the decrees of international law and play games with jurisdiction. In fact, all international airports have these zones where refugee and stateless people await t be either admitted or deported to their origins. Generally, the airlines get the role of taking care of the transit individuals. This relates they don’t afford the refugees and stateless individuals all their rights and freedoms. The basic needs like food and medicine are not guaranteed for the individuals who seek asylum. Considerations on gender are not given and the asylum seekers are hulled in one room regardless of gender (Freedman, 2003 p204). The rights of these individuals are infringed since they do not get the right treatment at the transit zones. These zones are characteristically described as detention centers for individuals seeking asylum. The services here contravene the international human rights guarantees and norms. These facilities consist of one to two rooms where there is no ratio on the number of occupants. They are deprived access to the outside environment on claims that they are a threat to national security, homeland integrity and can be terrorists (Hathaway, 2005 p311). The states like Slovak republic, Bulgaria and Romania have the worst transit zones in the universe. Here, the refugees and detainees do not receive any official backing concerning filing an asylum claim. They are deprived of any assistance on looking for refugee status as the international refugee law and human rights require. However in Europe Britain treats asylum seekers in tandem with international law (Great Britain, 2007 p342) In summary, the scope of international law on asylum seekers remains multifaceted. Each state maintains its own provisions on international rights for asylum seekers. The consideration of applications for asylum depends on the relations of the state with the origin of the asylum seeker. Bilateral transactions and relations are key factors that shade the implementation of asylum rights. Although the rights are stipulated clearly on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, most states do not follow these laws. Asylum rights are ignored on claims that the state is protecting its sovereignty and national security. In the real sense, they are protecting their bilateral ties. Asylum and refugee rights are at most times ignored at the transit zones at airports. These are institutions are developed by the states to counter asylum seekers. Their main rights to food and medicine are not guaranteed. Bibliography FREEDMAN, J. (2003). Gender and insecurity: migrant women in Europe. Aldershot, Ashgate GIBNEY, M. J. (2005). Immigration and asylum: from 1900 to the present 1. Santa Barbara, Calif. [u.a.], ABC-CLIO. GREAT BRITAIN. (2007). The treatment of asylum seekers. London, The Stationery Office. GOUDAPPEL, F. A. N. J., & RAULUS, H. S. (2011). The future of asylum in the European HATHAWAY, J. C. (2005). The rights of refugees under international law. Cambridge [u.a.], Cambridge Univ. Press. WEISSBRODT, D. S., & VEGA, C. D. L. (2007). International human rights law: an introduction. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press. Union: problems, proposals and human rights. The Hague, the Netherlands, T.M.C. Asser Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Asylum Rights in International Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1487701-what-is-the-status-of-asylum-within-international
(Asylum Rights in International Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1487701-what-is-the-status-of-asylum-within-international.
“Asylum Rights in International Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1487701-what-is-the-status-of-asylum-within-international.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Asylum Rights in International Law

The Legality of Sweeping Airport Security Measures

Therefore, an Act enacted to provide a regulatory framework must entail forward thinking approaches that incorporate holistic mechanics to safeguard infringement of individual entitlements enshrined in the bill of rights and championed by the international law.... According to the law, discretionary powers must be exercised within reasonable limits.... Thus, Roger has legal standing to seek redress in a court of law provided his testimony satisfy the "victim test" stipulated under Article 34 of the Human Rights Act of 1998....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Refugees and Asylum seekers in the U.S

, there are international frameworks... " will address the rising concerns of the infringement of the personal rights of the immigrants as they are subjected to the compulsory detentions against the provisions of the UNHCRF frameworks for refugees.... The paper "Refugees and asylum seekers in the U.... Involuntary reasons may stem up from running away from natural disasters such as earthquakes, political or civil wars, involuntary deportation as well as seeking asylum as refugees....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Immigration and Asylum Law

The asylum law can now be found in international conventions and agreements, such as the 1951 UN Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, and the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.... The law of nationality is related to two terms jus soli and jus sanguinis i.... Under UK law the legal sense of nationality attributed to the meaning of citizenship.... Asylum law is considered to be the part of international humanitarian law rather than immigration law....
4 Pages (1000 words) Case Study

Immigration and assylum law

The UK legislation supports such a conduct in accordance to which the non-immigrants can… the status of political asylum, and subject to the approval of the status, the non-immigrant will be provided with the authorized status of immigrant.... The government is also liable to offer basic amenities to its asylum seekers, and it is believed that in many of the cases the UK is considered be a welfare state, where the constitution permits availability of required resources for its citizens and immigrants The UK government has revised its policy in this regard, and the legislators have sought the scrutiny of the process....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Immigration Legislation in the EU

Compare the substantive, procedural and enforcement aspects of the two treaties through a discussion of the relevant case law under the… Immigration has become an increasingly debated topic within the UK and it is submitted at the outset that the media obfuscation of reality and acting as scaremonger has further compounded rational debate in this area.... On the other side of the legal spectrum, the implementation of the Human Rights Act in 1998 (HRA) enshrines the fundamental rights and freedoms of the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law....
19 Pages (4750 words) Essay

The Situation of African Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Israel

nbsp;… The author says that in 2005, nearly a hundred Sudanese from Darfur, who wished to seek asylum in the country were apprehended and detained under the Entry to Israel law.... nbsp; The country responded by reviving and enforcing a 50's law, the Prevention of Infiltration law in the early part of 2006.... Several NGO's had petitioned the High Court of Justice to put a stop on the use of such law by Israeli authorities....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

An Analysis of the Various Facets of Janes Asylum

First, a government is well within its rights to pursue and punish citizens, who infringe national laws and to oppose and execute individuals who employ force against it.... The paper "Jane's asylum" discusses that the parents of Jane have been divorced for the past six years.... However, this is not mandatory and does not have much significance for the process of granting asylum to Jane.... Jane's uncle decided to apply for asylum in the US, on her behalf; as she was unwilling to return to her father, whom she accused of physically abusing her....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Story of Tamils Asylums

Through this story, I discovered that the UK government has wanting weaknesses in handling asylum seekers' cases especially with the establishment of a policy stating that people of Tamil decency that seek international human right granted refuge in other countries that must be protected.... The ways in which cases of asylum seekers are treated in different countries including the United Kingdom continue to draw increased human rights concerns.... For instance, the government is obligated to provide protection to all people within their jurisdiction as provided for in the European Convention on Human rights (UCHR)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us