StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Appointment of Supreme Court Judges - Literature review Example

Cite this document
Summary
This review discusses the process of appointment of the Supreme Court which is purely based on the President’s nomination. The review considers the facts of the appointment process such as ideological similarities, political affiliations, ethnicity, religion, and gender…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91% of users find it useful
Appointment of Supreme Court Judges
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Appointment of Supreme Court Judges"

The process of appointment of Supreme Court s that 'the President will nominate and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint Judges of Supreme Court' (Rutkus 2005). The above statement shows that the appointment process of Supreme Court Judges is purely based on the President's nomination. President can nominate anyone and if the Senate agrees with the nomination, the person will become a Judge at Supreme Court for lifetime. Although it is not stated anywhere formally, but history proves that most of the Supreme Court Judges were nominated by presidents based on ideological similarities, political affiliations, ethnicity, religion, and gender (Rutkus 2005 p.9). Of course, the qualification, experience, and decision making capabilities are also analyzed and form an integral part of the appointment process.

Almost everyone would maintain that the appointment of Supreme Court Judges should not be made using the above criteria as this violates the principles of independence. A Supreme Court is the highest judicial bench in the country and as such, the decisions should be taken on merit; without prejudice to any person, belief, or religion; and after careful analysis of all evidences. However, if the appointments are made based on personal preferences, the decisions may be skewed towards the state and according to the desires of President's office.

This creates the controversy that Supreme Court is not as independent as one would like it to be.However, there are instances where Supreme Court decision was opposite to what the President would have wanted. Some famous incidents are quoted from The New York Times:'''The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made,'' Dwight D. Eisenhower said of his appointment of Chief Justice Earl Warren, who discomfited him with the Brown v. Board of Education ruling ordering desegregation of public schools, and other liberal opinions. Harry S. Truman was even more scathing about Justice Tom C.

Clark, a Truman appointee who voted against his 1952 seizure of the steel industry to avert a strike.' (Purdum 2005).This shows that the Court decisions are not always biased in favor of government policies and ideology. But these examples are few and far between. More often than not, since the Judge is nominated by the President, he or she tends to return the favor.In order to ensure as much transparency as possible in the process of appointing Supreme Court Judges, US regulations provide an additional level of approval, vis--vis, the Senate.

Although President can nominate the candidate, yet it has to be approved in the Senate before appointment can be made. There is a fair bit of debate on the role of Senate in advising on and consenting with the President's nomination. The history reveals that 'since the appointment of the first Justices in 1789, the Senate has confirmed 120 Supreme Court nominations out of 154 received.' (Rutkus 2005 p.4). Thus there are some controls to ensure that a review is carried out before the final appointment is confirmed.

Regardless of the nomination and appointment process of the Supreme Court Judges, the American citizens believe and trust that the Judge would evaluate all facets of the case before making his/ her judgment. This is how the rule of law can be upheld.Works CitedPurdum, S. T. 2005. Courts in transition: nominees and history; Presidents, Picking Justices, can have Backfires. The New York Times. Published 5 July 2005. Available from: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.htmlres=9A03E4D61E3AF936A35754C0A9639C8B63 [Accessed 23 April 2009].Rutkus, S. D. 2005. Supreme Court Appointment Process: Roles of the President, Judiciary Committee, and Senate.

CSR Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service - The Library of Congress. Updated 6 July 2005. Available from: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/50146.pdf [Accessed 23 April 2009].

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Appointment of Supreme Court Judges Literature review”, n.d.)
Appointment of Supreme Court Judges Literature review. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1515492-discussion-questions-essay
(Appointment of Supreme Court Judges Literature Review)
Appointment of Supreme Court Judges Literature Review. https://studentshare.org/law/1515492-discussion-questions-essay.
“Appointment of Supreme Court Judges Literature Review”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1515492-discussion-questions-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Appointment of Supreme Court Judges

Missouri Plan Law

However, a few of the fifty American States employ hybrid methods of selection for the Appointment of Supreme Court Judges.... Several other States use different variations of the Missouri Plan for the selection of supreme court judges.... The research paper is based on the Missouri Plan for selecting judges.... The research paper is based on the Missouri Plan for selecting judges.... Introduction: In the United States of America, judges are selected through employing one of the three available categories which are: elections, democratic appointment and the Missouri Plan....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

The Judiciary in England and Wales

For instance, Baroness Brenda Hale is the only female justice out of the 12 places in the supreme court of England.... Such is the argument of the President of the supreme court, Lord Phillips, who favours judicial appointments based on merit over diversification.... Consequently, the lone-rangers in the judiciary such as Hale have called for more women and ethnic minority judges in the courts.... Therefore, as such resistance to diversity among judges is considered to be misguided....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The US supreme court

However, the Appointment of Supreme Court Judges during the President Roosevelt's time came under cloud because between 1933 and 1937, the Supreme Court had declared six of Roosevelt's eight major New Deal programs unconstitutional.... The confirmation procedure of supreme court judges commences through hearings that are conducted by the Judiciary Committee, which are completed with voting by the complete strength of the Senate.... The US supreme court (10....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Appointing vs. Electing Judges to the Supreme Court

The appointments of supreme court Justices are a vote of the people, even though they are not direct elections.... It mainly depends on the supreme court Justices supreme court Justices are appointed by the United s of America's current President.... If approved, then the supreme court Justice takes the bench for life.... supreme court Justices should be appointed and not elected despite arguments against the practice....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Stephen Harpers and His reforms Regarding Section 96 and Supreme Judges Appointments

The role of office of the Supreme Court, as well as the federal court judges, falls under section 96 of the Constitution Act.... Provincial and municipal governments appoint provincial lower court judges among others2.... Among the promising aspects that gave Stephen Harper's conservative party an edge over their rivals refers to the democratic appointment processes for section 96 and supreme court judges1.... The judges sit in the provincial supreme court and court of appeal or in other equivalent courts....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Judicial Appointments

High court judges are referred to as the Right Honorable.... judges also play an important role in developing the law.... hellip; judges are required to interpret and apply the law in order to prevent the executive from exceeding its own powers.... England has various levels of the judiciary with different styles of judges.... There is a strict hierarchy of judges.... Currently, there are 1,825 judges in England....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

UK Legal System: Judicial Appointments Commision

Section 61, Chapter 1 of Part 4, which also established a supreme court in the United Kingdom and abolished the appellate jurisdiction of the House of Lords, endowed the JAC with three functions: to base appointments on merit alone; to consider candidates who are of good moral character, and; to “encourage diversity” among applicants (CRA 2005).... rdquo; The standard procedure then practiced in the appointment of British judges was the so-called “secret sounding” (2000)....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework

Is the US Supreme Court Too Powerful

… The paper "Is еhe US supreme court Too Powerful?... It is apparent that the United States' supreme court is the highest court in the States.... Over the federal and state courts, the supreme court has an ultimate appellate jurisdiction (Urofsky 590).... The paper "Is еhe US supreme court Too Powerful?... It is apparent that the United States' supreme court is the highest court in the States.... Over the federal and state courts, the supreme court has an ultimate appellate jurisdiction (Urofsky 590)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us