StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Business Law: Courts in England and Wales - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper talks about courts of law which are charged with the duty of interpreting statutes enacted by parliament. Statutory Interpretation involves the reading and application of the provisions of Acts of Parliament by judges who try to establish the intention of the lawmakers…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.9% of users find it useful
Business Law: Courts in England and Wales
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Business Law: Courts in England and Wales"

Insert Sta y Interpretations Courts of law are charged with the duty of interpreting statutes enacted by parliament.Statutory Interpretation involves the reading and application of the provisions of Acts of Parliament by judges who try to establish the intention of the lawmakers when enacting the legislation. Sometimes lawmakers use plain words in the statutes they pass (Michael 113). But in a majority of cases, courts are faced with statutory provisions with two or more conflicting meanings. The resulting vagueness calls for the court’s interpretation of the laws. In the English case of Twining v Myers (1982), a court’s interpretation was required to approve of or disqualify roller skates as a ‘vehicle’, the device was not captured explicitly in law. In some cases, English court’s interpretations of statutory provisions reflect the intention of parliament, while in other cases they do not. This is especially true in cases which do not comport with European Law (Nourse 70). The Principal Rules In England and Wales, judges normally adopt certain presumptions in an effort to interpret a statute (Rakoff 1560). Firstly, a presumption is something that is held to be true unless a factual argument voids it. These assumptions are: that the law remains the same unless the statutory provision in question shows a precise intention to alter it; the doctrine of Mens Rea or guilty mind required to support the success of a criminal conviction; and that in most cases, laws must be applied from the time of their coming into effect. Secondly, presumptions of language also guide judges in achieving the right statutory interpretations. Under the doctrine of Ejusdem generis, general words coming after certain words are normally interpreted as falling under the same category; for example, “any other individual” coming after tradesman and workman in a statute may be interpreted as inclusive of a laborer if a case involving a laborer comes before the court for interpretation (Rakoff 1560). In the case of Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse (1899), the court interpreted ‘other place’ which was appearing after a house, office, and room in a statute as some indoor place. Thirdly, under the doctrine of Noscitur a socis, statutory words are interpreted by the relevant group of words surrounding a contentious word or which are relevant to the statute as a whole; for example, floors can be construed by courts to mean any other aisles and spaces exclusive of storage spaces (Michael 113). Lastly, English and Welsh courts may apply the doctrine of Expression unius est exclusion alterius in statutory interpretation. This rule holds that the inclusion of a term excludes others; for instance, the express mention of ‘vehicle’ may exclude a bicycle. Literal Rule An application of the literal rule requires court to read the words of a statute and interpret them as they may appear in an ordinary dictionary, whether or not that meaning may be different from the intentions of legislature (Foy 292). The literal rule is the first principal doctrine that courts employ in seeking to construe the meaning of statutes. According to Lord Reid in the case of Pinner v Everett (1969), the literal rule gives the statute its original meaning in the Act and reveals the people’s will as parliament is composed of people’s representatives. In the case of Whiteley v Chappell (1868) a piece of legislation outlawed the impersonation of any individual in polls. The defendant attempted to vote in the name of a dead person, but when the judges applied the literal rule, he was found not guilty because ‘any person’ eliminates the deceased from the equation. In another case of Fisher v Bell (1961), the defendant was charged with displaying outlawed knives in his shop under The Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act (1959). The statute outlawed the sale of or offering for sale any offensive weapon. The court invoked the literal rule of contract law, which specifies that by displaying items in a shop the business is not offering the items for sale but merely invites customers to the treat in expectation of their offers to buy the items (Michael 113). In light of this, the court established that the accused was not guilty in spite of the clear parliamentary aim of outlawing such behavior by passing the Act. Golden Rule The golden rule enables the court to explore the literal interpretation of a word or phrase in an Act, but give the literal world(s) some meaning as a way of avoiding an absurdity (Rakoff 1562). UK’s courts normally apply the narrow approach and wide approach to achieve the golden rule. In the case of Re: Sigsworth (1935), the court denied an individual who was guilty of murdering his mother the opportunity to benefit from her riches on the basis that under the literal rule he would have legally been entitled to the proceeds as the result of his crime. In another example of a broad approach under the golden rule, an English court chose to include an issue that was beyond the scope of the Official Secrets Act 1920. In the case of Adler v George (1964) the defendant was accused of obstructing a soldier near a prohibited place. The accused party said that he was in the outlawed place, not near it. If the court had applied the literal rule, the defendant’s guilt would not have been confirmed, despite the fact that he had committed a crime. As Foy said, the court’s interpretation that being near a prohibited place includes being in it saved the situation from an absurdity (291). Mischief Rule Courts normally apply the mischief rule to establish what the legislature was trying to correct by enacting piece of legislation. The Rule requires courts to: study the previous laws prior to the enactment of the Act in question; identify the weaknesses of the previous law(s); Make a decision on how the legislature intended to correct the mischief by adopting the Act in question; and bring in that discovery to the issue before the court. Generally, the Mischief Rule requires that where parliament has enacted a statute to correct a lacuna in the law, the new law must be interpreted in a way that remedies the situation (Michael 113). In the case of Smith v Hughes (1960), the defendants were prostitutes soliciting for men in the streets while they were stationed in balconies. The plain, literal meaning of the Street Offences Act 1958 would have found them not guilty despite the fact that they were continuing with the mischief in the balconies and not in the streets as was specified in the law. Lord parker ruled that the intention of the Act was to clear the streets of the mischief that had become of the offenders and their ilk whether or not they had relocated to somewhere else. Purposive Approach The purposive approach explores the reason behind the enactment of a piece of legislation. In the case of Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Harts (1993), the court said the purposive approach must interpret the Act in question in a manner that creates that purpose. In this case, the court construed s63 of the Finance Act 1976, which tentatively provided the teachers a taxable benefit which was hived off from the ‘cash equivalent.’ The court said the purposive meaning of the teachers’ settlement of only 20% of the school fees for their children learning in the same schools they were working at amounts to a concession. Judicial Precedent According to Foy (295) Judicial Precedents are indispensable sources of law, following the Stare Decisis doctrine in statutory interpretation. According to the doctrine, judges should decide new statutory interpretations in a manner that is in line with past court verdicts and refrain from unsettling the established legal procedures of handling similar cases. Judicial Precedent is primarily based on the need for uniformity of the decisions on similar as a way of guaranteeing fairness and justice to the defendants and claimants (Staszewski 221). By faithfully following judicial precedents, judges normally find it a lot easier to interpret laws. Conclusion Statutory interpretations require the application of different principal rules so as to bring about the primary intention of parliament in enacting laws and or bridge the gap that exists in current laws. These criteria are the application of the: legal and language assumptions; the literal rule; the golden rule; the mischief rule; the purposive rule; and following judicial precedents. With these rules high on the agenda of judges confronted with a challenging statutory issue, finding a fair, just and reasonable judgment becomes easier. Works Cited Foy, III, H. Miles. On Judicial Discretion in Statutory Interpretation. Administrative Law Review, 62.2 (2010): 291-327. Michael Kirby. Statutory Interpretation: The Meaning of Meaning. Melbourne University Law, 35 (2011): 113. Nourse, Victoria F. A Decision Theory of Statutory Interpretation: Legislative History by the Rules. Yale Law Journal, 122.1 (2012); 70-152. Rakoff, Todd D. Statutory Interpretation as a Multifarious Enterprise. Northwestern University Law Review, 104.4 (2010): 1559-1586. Staszewski, Glen. Statutory Interpretation as Contestatory Democracy. William & Mary Law Review, 55 (2013): 221. Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Business Law: Courts in England and Wales Essay”, n.d.)
Business Law: Courts in England and Wales Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1627829-business-law-courts-in-england-and-wales
(Business Law: Courts in England and Wales Essay)
Business Law: Courts in England and Wales Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1627829-business-law-courts-in-england-and-wales.
“Business Law: Courts in England and Wales Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1627829-business-law-courts-in-england-and-wales.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Business Law: Courts in England and Wales

Principal Powers available to the courts in England & Wales

These are the magistrates' courts and the crown courts of wales and England.... The local courts were manned over by one of the lord's stewards or the lord himself.... It is not a comfortable experience to go on trial in a Welsh and English courts.... In 1406, the judicial view expressed that the King has transferred all his powers to the courts.... The high court of justice is an amalgamation between the court of chancery and existing courts of common law....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Hierarchical Structure of The Court System in England and Wales

The researcher of this essay aims to assess the hierarchical structure of the court system in england and wales and to analyze to what extent does the common law doctrine of binding precedent engage with the structure of the court system in england and wales.... The researcher then concludes that the court system in england and wales is divided into certain levels starting from Supreme Court to the Tribunals and Magistrates' Courts.... hellip; The Supreme Court, which was previously called House of Lords, took over the title of Supreme Court as the uppermost court of england and wales in 2009....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Statutory Interpretation Within the Courts

In addition, statutory interpretation is not regulated by the parliament which is the maker of laws but by the court In this essay, the primary purpose is to identify the standard powers available to the courts in england and wales in association with statutory interpretation.... Further According to Keenan and Riches in their book business law, judges must follow the laid out guidelines that are categorized according to their origin i.... Such factors includes; Use of ambiguous words, refrain of usage of… ertain terms by the draftsman, use of broad terms and phrases, unanticipated improvements of the law, and error during drafting or inadequate use of phrases....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Different Sources of Law in England and Wales

In such instances, courts in england and wales can sometimes opt to look aboard at the decisions of the courts made in other commonwealth countries in order to seek the necessary guidance or from them.... In the paper “The Different Sources of Law in england and wales” the author analyzes the legal order that currently exists in england and wales, which is not be governed by any single constitutional documentation but by a combination of common law, constitutional convention, statute and practice....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Assessing the Different Sources of the Law in England and Wales

This paper declares that Law in england and wales in quite rich in attaining its content from various sources.... There are four commonly known sources of law in england and wales out of which, two are internal sources while the other two are external sources.... nbsp;… According to the study the internal sources existent in england and wales are twofold and can be named as legislation or acts of parliament (Statute Law) and the decisions of the courts or judges (Common law)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

The Court of Appeal of England and Wales

The following paper 'The Court of Appeal of england and wales' focuses on the High Court at the first instance which deals with all the high value and high importance cases, and also has supervisory jurisdiction over all subordinate courts and tribunals.... he Court of Appeal of england and wales is the second most senior court in the English legal system, with only the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords above it.... he Chancery Division deals with business law, trusts law, probate law, and land law in relation to issues of equity....
13 Pages (3250 words) Case Study

Comparative Analysis of Observed Proceedings in Brent Magistrates Court and Southwark Crown Court

The UK courts apply English Law, that is, the law of england and wales established under the UK's Acts of Parliament.... Courts of england and wales include the County Courts, the Magistrate's Courts, the Crown Courts, the High Courts, the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.... The paper "Comparative Analysis of Observed Proceedings in Brent Magistrates' Court and Southwark Crown Court" compares the differences between these two courts and evaluates the administration of justice within both courts....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Sources of English Law

wing to the close ties between england and wales under the United Kingdom banner, and the United Kingdom as part of the bigger European Union (EU), EU Law has a direct impact on English Law.... n light of this, england and wales have a double affiliation to international law.... From this work, it is clear that English Law is premised upon different sources, which enable various courts in the land to execute their mandate.... hellip; The English legal system of courts dictates that the highest of all courts in the land is the Supreme Court....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us