StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Theory And Policy For Macroeconomics - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Theory And Policy For Macroeconomics" presents the debate between Keynesian and Classical economists on the efficiency of the market mechanism and the efficacy of government policy intervention on the basis of the current financial crisis…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.6% of users find it useful
Theory And Policy For Macroeconomics
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Theory And Policy For Macroeconomics"

Running head: Macroeconomics Macroeconomics: Theory & Policy (The debate between Keynesian and ical economists on the efficiency of the market mechanism and the efficacy of government policy intervention on the basis of current financial crisis) Abstract The current financial and economics crisis all over the world has again started debate among the economists about which economic theory is more useful in explaining market mechanisms. Some economists advocate the Keynesian economic theory whereas the others argue that Classical economic theory is more useful in studying the market mechanisms effectively. In any case, it is a fact that none of the economists were able to predict the current economic crisis before it actually occurred. Even the big corporate world failed to anticipate such a catastrophic event and the business world has suffered lot of setbacks because of the unexpected arrival of the current financial crisis since they failed to take any precautionary measures. This paper briefly explains both Keynesian economic theory and Classical economic theory and compares the merits of both in the basis of the current market failure and economic crisis. Introduction Keynesian economics and classical economics are the two major streams of economics. Classical economic theory was the first economic school of thought founded by the great economist Adam Smith in the 18 the century. The Classical economics theory assumes that free markets can regulate themselves if left alone, free of any human intervention (Patil, 2010). This theory has immense belief in the market’s ability to stabilise after fluctuations. Classical economists believe that it is difficult for the market to function without fluctuations because of the dependence of the market with so many other internal and external parameters. Any changes that happened in these parameters can affect the market mechanisms or the performances. Classical economists believe that the government need not intervene in the market to save it in case of big fluctuations as the market itself has the stabilising capacity. On the other hand, Keynesian economics the brain child of the great economist, John Maynard Keynes, believe that there is no divine entity, nor some invisible hand, that can tide us over economic difficulties, and we must all do so ourselves. It stresses on the fact that Government intervention is absolutely necessary to ensure growth and economic stability (Patil, 2010). Thus we can see that both classical economists and the Keynesian Economists have different views about the market mechanisms and the market functioning. The current economic crisis came at an unexpected time and neither the classical economists nor the Keynesian economists succeeded in predicting the current crisis. A deep understanding of the basic principles of these two models of economics will help us to understand the current crisis more deeply. Keynesian economics, classical economics and the current crisis As mentioned earlier classical economists believe that the involvement of government is not necessary even if the market goes out of control whereas the Keynesian economists believe that the government should have the control over the market. When we analyse the current financial crisis, we can conclude that the Keynesian economists were right as we cannot imagine, what was going to happen in case the government was stayed away from the market when the current crisis has started. In almost the entire countries, the governments entered the market and made lot of changes in their policies and the functioning of the market. For example, in America, the government has declared a stimulus package worth billions of dollars to save the economy from total destruction. The declared American stimulus package was worth around $ 825 billion in total; Tax Cuts - $275 Billion: Aid to States - $119 Billion: Education - $117 Billion: Infrastructure - $90 Billion: Aid to Those Hit Hardest - $106 Billion: Energy - $54 Billion: Science - $16 Billion: and Other - $48 Billion (Zacks Investment Research, 2009). The above statistics clearly shows that the government forced to aid the key areas of American economy to come out from the current crisis. Even then many people in America lost their jobs and many others had their salaries cut down. Unemployment has reached all time high now in America. If the Americans rely on the views of classical economists, the current financial crisis could have created even more negative results. Classical economists believe in flexible prices whereas the Keynesian economists argue for rigid or inflexible prices (Patil, 2010). Classical economists are of the opinion that the prices of the commodities like labor, land etc must be flexible for the market to function healthily. In other words, the prices should swing from one direction to other direction. But in reality, these prices normally swing in one direction only; to the upward direction only. The living standards and the family expenses are going high and it is rubbish to believe that the prices may come down at certain period of time. Keynesian Economists believe that the instead of the swings in market prices, the prices should stay stable. It is difficult for the business people and the consumers to actively participate in a market in which the prices go in one direction only; the upward direction. On the other hand, stable price is beneficial to both the consumers and the business people. The consumers can plan their expenses more meaningfully if the prices remain constant. The business people also can think of future investments and other business strategies more eagerly if the market does not undergo much fluctuation. For example, the current financial crisis destroyed the construction or the real estate sector. No real estate business group will currently think in terms of investing in the real estate sector because of the less demand. Classical economists believe that Supply creates its own demand (Say’s law). They believe that if a good is produced, it has to be bought. On the other hand, Keynesian economists argue that effective demand controls the supply (Patil, 2010). In this case also the argument of Keynesian Economics seems to be logical. Most of the production activities are currently demand driven only rather than supply driven. For example, take the earlier case of real estate sector itself. It is difficult to anticipate that more production/supply of buildings or apartments in the current economic crisis climate may boost the demand/sales. On the other hand it is logical to think that since many people were affected by the financial crisis the demand for new apartments or buildings will remain feeble today even if more of them were produced. The third argument of the classical economist is with respect to the savings. This assumption requires the household savings to equal the capital investment expenditures. The classical economists believe that the people will save more money if the interest rates are high whereas the Keynesian Economics believe that the desire to save for the future and commercial capital investments are solely based on the expected profitability of the endeavour (Patil, 2010). In this case also the argument of the Keynesian Economics seems to be more relevant. For example, for fixed deposits in financial institutions, people are getting a fixed amount as interest income whereas if they deposit their money in share markets or mutual funds, they may get huge benefits if the markets are growing at a substantial level. In other words, people will opt for the share market if the market condition is good. The bank interest rates will be higher only when the market condition would become good. In short, the people will be left with two choices when the market is growing; either to go for the bank deposits which yield fixed income or to go for share markets which have the potential of making their investment double or triple in a fixed time period. Classical economists believe that the wages will increases as the prices of the commodity increases and hence the price hikes might not affect the people’s life much. On the other hand, Keynesian economist argues that real wage decreases when the prices increase (Classical economics, n. d). Suppose an employee is drawing a salary of $ 2000 per month. The employer may increase the salary of the employee at the most by $ 500 when the prices go high in the market. But this $ 500 salary increase might be negligible when the market prices became skyrocketing. The essential commodity prices like, house rent, food, water, electricity, telephone bills, clothing etc all will have comparative hike in the price and the $ 500 increase would serve as nothing for an ordinary person at a period of price hikes. Classical economics have no clue about what is going to happen if the market is hit by a financial crisis. Depression and classical economics may not function together because of the contradictions in their principles. On the other hand, Keynesian economics and depression can function together as Keynesian economics have answers to the questions raised by depression. In fact, Keynesian economics deals mainly with avoiding a market crisis situation or market failure. Adam Smith described the market mechanism as an "invisible hand" that leads all individuals, in pursuit of their own self-interests, to produce the greatest benefit for society as a whole whereas Keynes arguments proved the modern rationale for the use of government spending and taxing to stabilize the economy (Major Schools of Economic Theory, n. d). Government should interfere in the market periodically when the market goes beyond the control of the government by varying the tax rates, interest rates etc. India is one of the fewest countries in the world which escaped from the current recession without many damages. Indian government has entered the market when the recession started to appear on the screen and made lot of policy changes tackle the recession. The tight measures taken by the Indian government during the recession period has recently liberalised again when the government felt that the threats from recession is over. Conclusions Classical economics and Keynesian economics have different views about the market mechanisms. Classical economist believes that the market has the self stabilizing ability without seeking help from the government whereas the Keynesians believe that the government should interfere in the market whenever it goes beyond the control. Classical economics believe that the market is supply driven whereas the Keynesians believe that the market is demand driven. Both Keynesians and the classical economist differ in their opinions about savings, wages, unemployment, prices etc also. In the current world, Keynesian economics seems to be the best economic theory compared to classical economic theory in handling recession like economic problems. References 1. Major Schools of Economic Theory (n. d) Retrieved on 21 March 2010 from http://www.frbsf.org/publications/education/greateconomists/grtschls.html 2. Patil Sayali Bedekar , (2010)Classical Economics vs Keynesian Economics, Retrieved on 21 March 2010 from http://www.buzzle.com/articles/classical-economics-vs-keynesian-economics.html 3. Zacks Investment Research, (2009), Americas New Stimulus Package, Retrieved on 21 March 2010 from http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewarticle/articleid/2964166 4. Classical economics, (n. d), Retrieved on 21 March 2010 from http://www.theshortrun.com/classroom/doctrines/classicals.html Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Theory And Policy For Macroeconomics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words, n.d.)
Theory And Policy For Macroeconomics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1564420-macroeconomics-theory-policy
(Theory And Policy For Macroeconomics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
Theory And Policy For Macroeconomics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1564420-macroeconomics-theory-policy.
“Theory And Policy For Macroeconomics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1564420-macroeconomics-theory-policy.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Theory And Policy For Macroeconomics

Eonomic Signals and Cost-Benefit Analysis in Macroeconomics

He, after second world war, presented in this book ‘Economics in One Lesson' that the main concept behind all studies and theories of economies is that the analyst and policy makers should keep in mind the long term and larger impacts of any economy policy and not only the short term implications (Rockwell, 7).... Economic Signals and Cost-Benefit Analysis in macroeconomics [N a m e] [Course][Class] [Professor] [Date] QUESTION # 1: ECONOMIC DATA AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS ANALYSIS: In order to survive in this highly competitive world, it is important for the businesses to carefully analyze and interpret the situation before coming up with different strategies....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Economic Analysis, Rule-Based Approaches

Name: University Course: Instructor: Date: macroeconomics (Question a) There is always much debate on the concept of rule versus discretion in regulating aggregate demand.... In monetary policy, discretion is normally essential in offsetting output fluctuations often realized in Keynesian frameworks.... On the other hand, policy options that are based on rules usually have little room for policy errors.... It allows policy makers to learn much from the interaction between various relevant stakeholders....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Macroeconomics: Theory and Policy

This paper "Macroeconomics: theory and policy" presents planning that is a useless endeavor because developments in e-business/e-commerce and in the political, economic and societal environments are moving too quickly nowadays.... hellip; The debate over the planned economy and free-market mechanism started long ago when the classical economists refuted the mercantilists' theory.... This mercantile theory was strongly opposed by Adam Smith, who emphasized on the 'invisible hand' and 'laissez-faire'....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Location of Economic Activity

nbsp;… The author states that Paul received this award for his analysis of the tradeoff between unemployment and inflation in various time periods in macroeconomic policy.... He described the relationship between the short-run and long-run effects of economic policy.... The starting point of a theory is an observation of a particular process.... His work focused on the human development theory, the underlying mechanism of poverty, and political liberalism....
2 Pages (500 words) Case Study

The Rise and the Fall of Keynesianism

Keynesianism or Keynesian economics is a body of ideas, which were set forth by John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) in his works that included the book titled ‘The General theory of Employment, Interest, and Money' – 1936 (Keynes and Krugman, 2007).... This view was neoclassical and is defined as a ‘demand-side' theory whose focus is short-run, in which aggregate demand strongly influences economic output especially during economic fluctuations such as recessions....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Macroeconomic Theory and Policy

The major features of the Bretton Woods System were obligation of every country to establish a monetary policy which maintained an exchange rate of its currency to US dollar as well as ability of IMF in bridging the temporary payment imbalances in terms of gold (Evans & Seppo 2007, p.... The situation raises economic policy dilemma as a result of exacerbation of unemployment by decreasing the rates of inflation.... In version of the Keynesian macroeconomic theory dominant during the late 1970s and at the end of World War II, recession and inflation were regarded to be mutually exclusive with relationship between them described by Phillips curve....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

International Macro Post

Macroeconomics: theory and policy.... The country has to establish conventional macroeconomics to guide in managing economic growth and economic development instead focusing on GDP and neglecting other economic concerns such as inflation, unemployment and externalities....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Macroeconomic Stabilization Theory and Policy

This coursework describes the macroeconomic stabilization theory and policy.... Considering the significance of a clearing market in the study of macroeconomics, this report will make use of economic principles and theories in discussing why the aggregate labor market as a clearing market is difficult to achieve.... This paper outlines the aggregate labor market as a clearing market, development of new economic theory that explains high levels of the unemployment rate, economic factors that makes market-clearing in the labor market difficult to achieve....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us