StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay 'The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy' will examine Socrates’ notions of a highest good and justice, his linking of the individual and society through an integrated philosophical approach, and the implications of different choices regarding public administration…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.7% of users find it useful
The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy"

The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy Introduction One of the main attractions of Socrates in Plato’s Republic was his constant focuson issues of immediate relevance to man both individually and in a larger social context. Rather than addressing issues of a metaphysical nature, he instead dealt with questions and concerns that impacted people’s lives more directly and more concretely. Though his teaching style was deliberately coy he was able to cultivate a set of responses that was consistent with his notion of a highest good and justice for both individuals and for society more generally. In addition, rather than relying on theological arguments, he chose instead to rely on human reason and logic to guide his ethical inquiries. These two characteristics, the concern for practical applications of his philosophy and the use of reason to supplant theological directives, distinguished Socrates. His was an attempt to teach people how to better define the highest good, how to attain justice, and therefore how to attain happiness both individually and socially. This essay will examine Socrates’ notions of a highest good and justice, his linking of the individual and society through an integrated philosophical approach, and the implications of different choices regarding public administration and public order. The Highest Good and the Role of Philosophy As a preliminary matter, it is important to note that Socrates’ teachings were most directed at the individual. The highest good, therefore, was a condition that each individual was capable of attaining; however, this highest good could only be known through reason and a knowledge of one’s self. Socrates equated this highest good with knowledge and happiness. Significantly, though, he went to great lengths to distinguish true happiness from illusory pursuits of happiness. He did this by drawing distinctions between absolute levels of ignorance and fancy ideals of true knowledge. These distinctions, often grounded in Socrates’ claims that he knew nothing, provided the intellectual framework for subsequently exploring ultimate questions of goodness, justice, and proper forms of public administration. In effect, he tore down common assumptions, challenged certain modes of thinking, and in the process attempted to redefine both the proper focus and method of philosophical inquiry as well as the practical application of philosophy to man’s life and to social affairs. Central to man’s pursuit of happiness was the intellectual process by which he confronted choices and made decisions. In many ways, Socrates reduced the highest good to a decision-making process in which a noble existence was chosen rather than succumbing to false inducements often coloured with pleasure. He believed in a form of objective happiness, linking it ultimately to justice, “I think justice belongs in the best class of good, that which should be loved for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences by anyone who is going to be blessed” (358a1-3). Here in this passage, Socrates refers to a best good; the implication is that there are degrees of goodness and that a highest good is the ideal. Further, he refers to justice as one part of this best class of good; the other parts are an objective state of happiness, an honest and objective knowledge of one’s self, and an ability to know what is necessary and unnecessary. An individual that knows his limits is far wiser and more virtuous than a man that pursues goals beyond his means or in contravention of his own objective happiness. In short, the highest good is an objective happiness attained through the philosophical process of reason. Knowledge is crucial to this inquiry, and both the highest good and justice are dependent on Socrates’ philosophical approach. Relationship of Highest Good to Justice Socrates’ belief in a highest good, while a reasoning process that was focused on the individual, was also used to discuss larger issues of social organization and policy. This expansion into the realm of society more generally was accomplished through the concept of justice. Interestingly, rather than severing the philosophical process, Socrates instead advocated a singular definition of justice which applied to both the individual and to the larger city-state of his time. A careful reading suggests that justice is a consequence of reason, knowledge, and reconciliation. At the individual level, reason was used to reconcile the three disparate part’s of an individual’s soul. These parts of the soul, as outlined by Socrates, were reason, spirit and desire. The most disruptive parts, the ones that led to false pursuits of happiness, were spirit and desire. It was necessary, if a just man was to prevail, that man used his reason in order to tame or reconcile the spirit and the desire. As stated by Socrates, the rational part of the soul “has in it the knowledge of what is advantageous for each part and for the whole in common of the three parts” (442c5-8). Reason thus resides in the soul, as does knowledge, and is called upon by each individual in an effort to control the spirit and the desire in an effort to know justice and to become just. The just person acts virtuously in all circumstances and this is accomplished through the philosophical process of reason and distinguishing true knowledge from false allures. At the social level, a similar philosophical approach was encouraged. Nowhere in Plato’s account was Socrates reported to have advocated what we now know as democracy; quite the contrary, as he did with the individual, Socrates carved out a city-state inhabited by three distinct types of people. These three types were the people that loved wisdom, the people that functioned as auxiliaries, and the workers. An individual was deemed just when his reason ruled his spirit and his desire; for Socrates, a society or a city-state was deemed just when it was ruled and administered by the lovers of wisdom rather than the auxiliaries or the workers. Implicit in this approach was a firm belief that certain individuals were more suited to certain tasks. The lovers of wisdom, just men themselves who knew how to obtain the highest good, would rule and the auxiliaries and workers would be left to fulfill their tasks without any responsibility for ruling. What results, ironically enough, is an hierarchally-ordered society. This, however, would not appear to trouble Socrates because the philosophers administering the city-state would know the highest good, would be just themselves, and would use this knowledge and this individual justice for public administration. A man unable to understand the highest good, a man that is unable to use reason to tame his spirit and his desire, is therefore best suited to life as a guardian or a worker. And guardians and workers have no place in the public administration of the city-state. Socrates accepts as perfectly natural the fact that not all people can know the highest good and become just. His ideal city-state, in this way, reflects an accommodation to the extant that individuals are different in both capacity and attainment. Implications for Citizens and Public Order The implications for citizens and for public order seem harmless enough to Socrates, though they would most certainly raise eyebrows in many societies today. At the individual level, citizens are herded into one of three classes. For Socrates, this is both necessary and desirable. He treats the allocation of citizens as ruler and ruled as a sort of logical precondition for creating a unified city-state (462ab) and a society which is bound together in the most just of all possible amalgamations (519e-520a). The reality, and one which Socrates seems to acknowledge freely enough, is that a caste system of sorts has been created. Will workers accept this type of rule? Will their children be able to escape the worker class in the future? Will their spirit and desire override their reason and lead to conflict? Where the ruled do not know the highest good, where the ruled are characterised by varying degrees of unjust behavior, is it possible to harmonise the social classes advocated by Socrates. The implications for public order seem ominous. Public order, in the final analysis, depends on satisfying the needs and desires of the governed, the use of force, or some combination thereof. Socrates, however, has acknowledged that not all citizens will understand the highest good or be able to use their reason to control their spirit and desire. True, the just ruler will not be tempted by corruption; reason will trump desire or spirit in this respect. But the question of public order is no so much concerned with the enlightened rulers as with the governed. They are auxiliaries and workers either because they do not understand that reason can tame spirit and desire or because they are unable or unwilling to use their reason towards the ends advocated by Socrates. Conflict would seem to be inevitable. The only question is how much conflict is inevitable and how do just leaders maintain public order. Socrates does not answer this question so well and he does not answer it very specifically; instead, he explains how not to maintain public order by elaborating upon and illustrating certain defective social arrangements such as aristocracy (545c ff), timocracy (550c ff), oligarchy (555b ff), democracy (562a ff), and tyranny (562a ff). The essence of Socrates’ critiques is consistent with his notions of the highest good and the just man and the just ruler. These forms of social and political organization were defective because reason did not rule the soul, because unjust men were placed in positions of leadership and public administration, and because there was little or no harmony among the citizens. These examples, however, do not answer how public order is to be maintained in Socrates’ ideal society other than a leap of faith that such disparate souls and interests can be reconciled and harmonised through just and wise leadership. It sounds beautiful, but the inherent contradictions among the classes of the citizenry, would appear to bode ill for a society premised upon such views. Conclusions In conclusion, there is much to be praised. Socrates rejects theological directives, he advocates a philosophical process that teaches man to think individually, and he defines concepts such as a highest good, justice and public service in terms that stress ethical behavior and self-sacrifice. There is little to take issue with in these respects. From an individual point of view, his counsel seems wise and valuable. The problems arise when Socrates moves from the individual to society more generally. By creating, in effect, a caste system he is stratifying society. Worse, he acknowledges that the lower castes, the auxiliaries and the workers, may not understand or accept the social organization into which there are to be placed. He instead assumes that just rulers can persuade or govern in such a manner as to tame or restrain the wayward spirits and desires. In my view, this is a contradictory social structure and idealism has its limitations. References Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy Essay - 1, n.d.)
The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy Essay - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1543722-justice
(The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy Essay - 1)
The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy Essay - 1. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1543722-justice.
“The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy Essay - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1543722-justice.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Highest Good and Justice: The Role of Philosophy

Poltical science - political philosophy

This seeming inconsistency between the rigid restriction of philosophy among the people and the importance of philosophy to the proper governing of that society prompts the question; did Plato believe the philosopher posed a danger to the state or a benefit?... However, it is important to note that This distinction would suggest that he held philosophy in high regard and felt it was even necessary for the proper function of a society.... To answer this question, it is necessary to delve into Plato's description of the perfect leader which includes an investigation into the concepts of morality and ethics as well as an understanding of the restrictions and opportunities he envisioned for his ideal society's exposure to philosophy....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Philosophy: Meaning, Modes

The assignment analyses the role of philosophical thinking.... This assignment "Philosophy: Meaning, Modes " discusses areas and history of philosophy, metaphysics, and epistemology.... This assignment explains the importance of studying philosophy: Plato.... hellip; philosophy is the study of the basic nature of reality, existence, and knowledge normally when taken to be an academic discipline.... philosophy is a complex subject dealing with fundamental aspects of value and reality....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Why should we belive in a religion

Only by admitting the existence of God, able to observe the good and the... To begin with, the special status of religion and religiosity was claimed in ancient Greek philosophy (Hare).... Moreover, almost the majority of Greek philosophy was riddled with the idea of the existence of a divine origin, and every philosopher gave it his own interpretation.... Despite the… of atheists with respect to the existence of God and the need to be a believer, many philosophers, even those who were skeptical of religion, admitted its special role in human life....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

Platos Royal Lies and Manuscript Illustration in Islamic Art

Through the dialogue, Plato tried to duplicate the way Socrates taught philosophy: by engaging his students on a significant question.... In the Introduction page of Plato's Republic (Complete) by Plato, Karl Popper in the 20th century is quoted as saying that: he considered the Republic to be “probably the most elaborate monograph on justice ever written”.... But he interpreted it as a form of totalitarian justice.... hellip; To keep the breed of the guardians pure, certain nurses were to bring up the offspring of good parents, but inferior offspring would be put away in a mysterious unknown place....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

Philosophy: Utilitarianism Concept

Utilitarian professed the aim of philosophy to strive for the greatest goodness (pleasure enhancement) of the highest number of individuals, with exemption from pains.... By making this statement Mill is trying to address those concerns where detractors of Epicureanism understand his philosophy as a 'craving for the fulfillment of sensual appetites.... Mill finds it degrading to the philosophy, its proponents and followers it's understanding the pleasure in its 'grossest form' as a form of beauty, ornament or amusement alone....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Understanding the Motives and the Causes of Impulses Into International Relationships

A stable society is that which is free from civil strife because the members of the state share common good and resources in a way that does not infringe into the rights of others.... Philosophers are believed possess to the highest understanding of principles of nature and can be trusted to concoct the best political order.... hellip; The common good of the public and the limited resources amidst extended desire to for more may pit the public against each other but the political system in place puts due measures to give every individual fair chance....
14 Pages (3500 words) Research Paper

Plato's Contribution to the Ancient and Present Human Thinking

According to Alfred Whitehead, the Western philosophy about ethics, metaphysic and ethics all has Plato footnote meaning that his influence of the Western thought is insurmountable (philosophy).... The Republic offers must understand about justice.... The character in the Republic argues that justice is the ideas and interest of the strong over the weak.... In these questioning, Plato makes us understand that not all that is pursued by the mighty is right and that those who pretend to actualise justice are the worst enemy of justice....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

A Vision of the Good Life

On the contrary, deontological philosophy advocates for the best outcome, in which all entities receive the correct oral action depending on the rules, laws, and intuition (Goodin, 1995).... Thus, the action in deontological philosophy must justify the end.... This paper "A Vision of the Good Life" provides the answers to such questions, as a social justice issue, luck egalitarianism theory, discrimination on the basis of sexual identity, political and ethical dimensions of existentialism, differences between Bentham and Mills versions of utilitarianism....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us