StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

How EU Subsidizes Unfairness - Coursework Example

Cite this document
Summary
This coursework called "How EU Subsidizes Unfairness" describes the international business environment and global trade. This paper outlines subsidizing agriculture, effect that the subsidy has on international trade in agricultural products, subsidy and consumers, CAP benefits. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96% of users find it useful
How EU Subsidizes Unfairness
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "How EU Subsidizes Unfairness"

How EU Subsidizes Unfairness Agricultural exports are one of the most important parts of the global trade. Recent statistics placed the total of world agricultural exports to $852 billion and this accounts for approximately 9 percent of the global trade. (1) It affects one third of the earth’s land surface, more than any other human enterprise.(2) Currently, agriculture has been the single most controversial trade issue in international trade. Specifically, the agricultural subsidy has been behind much of the disagreements, with countries with such policy, such those comprising the European Union, accused of unfair trade practices. This paper will examine the European Union’s agricultural subsidy: whether it does more harm than good. Subsidizing Agriculture According to Myers and Kent, there are several reasons why countries subsidizes agriculture: first is that governments consider it a prime responsibility to keep their citizens fed, so there is the perceived duty to support farmers and double crop production; secondly, farmers worldwide have often been included in the poorest sector of society so policymakers feel that they deserve help.(2, p. 40) All in all, the rationale behind agriculture subsidies is to ensure that there are adequate food supplies, the prices for farm products remain stable and to help the farming sector more competitive and in the process help the poor and develop rural communities. In the European Union, agricultural subsidies rake billions of dollars of expenditures each year, constituting nearly three-quarters of the annual total budget of the EU. (1, p. 339) Support for agriculture is handled by a Common Agricultural Policy or CAP. Here, the policy uses a variable levy to bring the world price of an agricultural import up to the domestic price level as well as subsidizes exports of its surplus commodities on world markets, driving down prices for other potential exporters. The diagram below demonstrates this: Fig. 1: The EU Agricultural Market Support System (3, p. 28) What effect does the subsidy has on international trade in agricultural products? Agricultural subsidies such as those of the EU’s have devastating effects on the international market, especially on the poor countries. Subsidies lead to over-production that is dumped on the world market, depressing world prices; and these subsidized imports enter developing countries’ markets with lower tariffs as a result of the AoA and IMF and World Bank conditionalities. (4) It is impossible for farmers from poor economies to compete with the low prices of agricultural products and usually go out of business. Unfortunately, this destroys local and rural production as imported and considerably cheaper agricultural products flood the local market. The Food Agricultural Organization, in its study conducted in fourteen countries in Asia, Latin America and Africa, found that the agricultural subsidies are directly related to the displacement and marginalisation of farm labourers, which led to the growing poverty among farmers as well as food-insecure groups.(5) Subsidies also work the same way as tariffs in destroying potential market access in EU. Even if a country in the European Union had low tariff bindings and applied rates in a particular product, imports may still be nonexistent if such country has sufficient generous subsidy policies, since this increase domestic production at the expense of imports. (6) Then there is the fact that EU agriculture tariffs are four to five times more than manufactured goods and much higher for processed agricultural products, which makes it more difficult for developing countries to capitalize on value-added production of their own farm products. (7) This is especially significant because the agriculture sector in developing and poor countries occupy a significant portion of the population, with a huge number of people depending on agriculture for livelihood. In Europe, as in all developed countries, agriculture is a very small share of employment, which is about 2% or less. (7, p. 3) The injustice, hence, committed by the EU agriculture subsidies impacts millions of farmers and their families. Finally, critics argue that that EU’s agricultural subsidies are mostly on purchasing, storage and exporting processes. The consequence of this is that there is a generation of vast agricultural surpluses, which are politely called “intervention stocks.” If CAP continues on its present course, it will generate surpluses of 58 million tonnes of cereals and 1.5 million tonnes of beef by early next century with estimates for dairy and wine products not close behind. (8) CAP Benefits Agricultural subsidies have certainly benefited European farmers and agriculture industry. The top 25 percent of farmers in terms of size in EU gets about 75 percent of the total support, the top 4 percent of farms receive 21 percent and that in France, Denmark, and the Netherlands, the average income of farm households is more than 50 percent above the average income of other households. (9) In regard to the aims of the subsidy on agriculture, CAP is beneficial especially in the context of protecting the agriculture sector. However, the advantages of the agricultural subsidy vary according to country in the European Union. Some countries benefit from it tremendously because they receive a big chunk of agricultural support, while some are at a disadvantage because they are forced to contribute more. Table 1, for instance, demonstrates that France has been the recipient of huge agricultural subsidies since the CAP was established and that as smaller countries rely more on EU-funded subsidies, taxpayers from countries that are forced to contribute more, have to bear the brunt. A case in point is the United Kingdom. Percentage of EU Subsidies (10, p. 88) Starting from the mid-1990s, the economic cost of CAP programme to UK was estimated at some £17 billion per year and that on top of the direct net financial or nominal cost of the EU’s agricultural subsidisation programme, additional massive real economic or opportunity costs were incurred through loss of the benefits of investing scarce resources in more productive areas. (11) And so in theory, UK farmers should receive subsidies out of the British contribution to the agricultural subsidy budget. However, this is not the case since UK has, in effect, been forced to support comparatively small and inefficient farmers and uneconomic crop production in Europe. This dimension to CAP has encouraged the failure in introducing fundamental agricultural reforms because it institutionalized inefficiency to the point of rewarding them. Will consumers in EU be better off without this subsidy? All in all, CAP has kept thousands of unprofitable European farm enterprise in business for decades and that while EU farmers benefit from agricultural subsidies, this gain has been achieved at the expense of taxpayers, household consumers, overseas producers and the long-term interests of the agriculture industry itself as CAP now accounts for about 85% of the world’s agricultural subsidies. (11, p. 136) Today, EU households have to pay for the CAP twice over: first: through higher taxes, and then, through higher food prices. (11, p. 136) Through a complex system driven by the policies, regulations and treaties spawned by the European integration, taxes on individuals and taxes on food and agricultural products were imposed, with much of the revenues funnelled into the pockets of EU’s farmers and land owners. Furthermore, in 2002 and 2003, the prices of sugar, veal, and beef in the EU were about 300 percent more than the prices on world markets, while pork costs 31 percent more, poultry, 56 percent more and milk was 85 percent more expensive. (12) According to the Agriculture and EU Enlargement Report (13, p. 44): The CAP is costing to the EU-15 households (as consumers and taxpayers) more than the whole EU budget, on average over 1,000 Euro per four-member household. The largest parts are still oriented to producers of specific commodities. These income transfers to farmers (over €16,000 a year for equivalent full-time worker) take place while the excess of resources in agriculture is already very high. And so, it makes sense to say that consumers are better off without such agricultural subsidies. Conclusion Agricultural subsidies are part of the general welfare-oriented economies in Europe. This is particularly important in the case of the farmers and the agriculture sector because they are pivotal in the assurance of adequate food supply and stable food prices. However, after CAP was established, agricultural subsidies have been doing more harm than good. Yes, farmers and the agriculture sector have extensively benefited but this has resulted to adverse consequences both in Europe and its citizens as well as in the objectives of free trade. Today, Europeans must pay more taxes and higher food prices for agriculture that is at times inefficient and currently overproducing. The cost of subsidies has so far outweighed the benefits for EU. Then, agricultural subsidies hinder free trade and drive the commission of injustices for other farmers across the globe. The protectionist dimension in agricultural subsidies has left many people marginalized and without jobs as EU’s cheap agricultural produce floods the international market, distorting the idea of fair competition. There is a need to review and reform EU’s agricultural subsidies because, presently, it is unfair and unproductive in most respects. Bibliography 1. Schaffer, R., Agusti, F. and Earle, B. International Business Law and Its Environment. 7th ed. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning, 2008. 2. Myers, N. and Kent, J. Perverse Subsidies: how tax dollars can undercut the environment and economy. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 2001. 3. Gardner, B. European agriculture: policies, production, and trade. London: Routledge, 1996. 4. Jawara, F. and Kwa, A. Behind the scenes at the WTO: the real world of international trade negotiations: Lessons of Cancun. London: Zed Books, 2004. 5. FAO (Food Agriculture Organization). Agriculture, Trade and Food Security: Issues and Options in the WTO Negotiations from the Perspective of Developing Countries, Vol. II, Country Case Studies. Rome: FAO, 2000. 6. Brown, C. Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement. Brookings Institution Press, 2009. 7. Wise, T. “The Paradox of Agriculture Subsidies. Global Development and Environment Institute, Working Paper No. 04-02, 2004, pp. 3. 8. Krebs, J., Wilson, J., Bradbury, R. and Siriwardena, G. “The Second Silent Spring?” NATURE, Vol. 400, 1999, pp. 612. 9. Beghin, J. and Aksyo, A. Agricultural Trade and the Doha Round: Lessons from Commodity Studies. Briefing Paper, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, 2003, pp. 2. 10. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation. Paris: OECD, 2000. 11. Abott, L. British withdrawal from the European Union. Manchester: Industrial Systems Research, 2002. 12. Sinn, H. Can Germany be saved?: the malaise of the worlds first welfare state. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2007 13. Michael, J. Agriculture and EU Enlargement: Seventeenth Report of 2003-2004 Report,Together with Formal Minutes,Oral a Written Evidence. House of Commons Papers 2003-04 421, The Stationery Office, 2004, pp. 44. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(How EU Subsidizes Unfairness Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
How EU Subsidizes Unfairness Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/politics/1565606-international-business-environment
(How EU Subsidizes Unfairness Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
How EU Subsidizes Unfairness Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/politics/1565606-international-business-environment.
“How EU Subsidizes Unfairness Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/politics/1565606-international-business-environment.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF How EU Subsidizes Unfairness

Non-Discrimination in WTO Law

This is how non-discrimination is enforced in the WTO; its stated aims are to expand free trade equally without barriers to all members, make trade predictable through rules and a truly competitive undertaking by removal of subsidies.... Thamer Aloudah Professor's Name: Scope, Meaning and Relevance (Non-discrimination in WTO Law) 15 July 2011 A....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

The Development of Countervailing Duties

However, in the framework of uneven development, how possible can the concept of fairness be pursued?... This paper aims to delve on the analysis of the countervailing duties based how these are being implemented, enforced and resolved under the umbrella of the World Trade Organization....
19 Pages (4750 words) Essay

Fiscal Framework for Ontarios Industrial Development

Electoral process of any country is based on how effective the incoming government is going to deliver on their promises.... THOUGHTS ON A FISCAL FRAMEWORK FOR ONTARIO'S INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Name: Institution: Course: Instructor: Date: Abstract A numbers of rationales have been proposed to help address market failures and inefficiencies especially in the industrial sector of Canada....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), first signed in 1947, was initiated to provide an international platform to promote free international trade through tariff reduction and act as a mechanism for settling trade disputes between its member nations.... hellip; During the early years, GATT had no formal organisation....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Competition and Competition Policy

… This paper will review the current eu policy on competition and other statutes and provide advice to the company on its expansion plans.... This paper Competition and Competition Policy is an advisory to Blue Peer Plc, a major supplier of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beer in the United Kingdom....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

Organizational Behavior at Hirbodan Company

hellip; The main aim of my research is to find how such a company has wage through the turbulence experienced in Iran and become a success.... Its main services are procurement, construction, and engineering across quite a number of industries.... Its main objective is to become a leading contractor in the energy sector....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Objectives of Virgin Atlantic Airline with the British Red Cross

All these will be done through ensuring that they offer the best business product in the air, grow their leisure business further and run an effective and efficient global airline.... The objective of the British Red Cross is to follow the overall strategic goal of improving the… From the above objectives, the VAA and British Red Cross have an objective in common where they both serve the people gently and to make them satisfied of the services offered....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

The Promotion of Free Trade among Countries

The paper “The Promotion of Free Trade among Countries” seeks to evaluate the promotion of free trade among countries, which was one of the important objectives of the World Trade Organization, especially as spelled out under the GATT – General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.... hellip; The author states that globalization has resulted in physical geographical boundaries because the tools of technology available through the Internet have facilitated long distance a long-distance in a cost-effective manner....
21 Pages (5250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us