StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Change in the Locus Standi Rules in an Action for Annulment of Community Measures - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Change in the Locus Standi Rules in an Action for Annulment of Community Measures" highlights that academic opinion has suggested that the willingness of the Court to allow private applicants to challenge true regulations demonstrates a liberal trend by the court. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.6% of users find it useful
Change in the Locus Standi Rules in an Action for Annulment of Community Measures
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Change in the Locus Standi Rules in an Action for Annulment of Community Measures"

PART A This question requires the discussion of whether a decision issued by the EU commission can be challenged by a member or an individualbasically concerning the admissibility element or the 'locus standi' requirements of Art 230 and the particular difficulties encountered by non-privileged applicants. Based on the information given in the question I would like to point out firstly that France will be able to challenge this decision which is aimed at UK. This is because Article 230 EC recognises the Council, the Commission, the Parliament and the Member States as 'privileged applicants' who will always have the locus standi to bring actions against Community acts. Also on the basis of Article 230 EC, individuals and other private parties will always retain the jurisdiction to challenge decisions addressed to them. As far as the claims of Jacques St Malo, Pierre St Michel, and Sainsbury's Supermarkets are concerned they will be subject to the limitation to this principle which is the personal interest principle. Furthermore this "personal interest" will only be held to exist where the annulment of the act can produce legal effects for these applicants.1 Private parties do not have standing to act in the interest of the law or of the Community in general.2 Private parties like the ones mentioned above therefore can also challenge decisions addressed to other persons, as well as regulations or other general legislative acts. However, they can only do this when they can show that these are of 'direct and individual concern' to them. .3 The Court of Justice has interpreted the concept of 'direct concern' to mean that a direct causality must exist between the act that is challenged and the legal situation of the individual challenging that act.4 A measure will be of direct concern if it affects the legal position of the defendant/applicant directly and leaves no discretion to the addressees of the measure who are responsible for its implementation.5Such an implementation has to be automatic and a result of Community rules without the application of other intermediate rules6. For determining individual concern, the case Plaumann v. Commission7was a seminal one and gave judicial review a rather restricted application in the Court of Justice8 where the court defined applicants as individually concerned if the decision or act "'affects them by reason of certain attributes which are peculiar to them or by reason of circumstances in which they are differentiated from all other persons and by virtue of these factors distinguishes them individually (para 107) Based on the Court's view in Plaumann where he was affected by the decision as an importer of Clementines, and it was held that this did not distinguish him in relation to the contested decision as in the case of the addressee.Since the test in this case requires the applicants to belong to a closed category, membership of which is fixed and ascertainable at the date of the adoption of the contested measure it would seem that Pierre St Michel, a Breton poultry farmer, who intends to export poultry to the UK this month and .Sainsbury's Supermarkets, who sell French and other countries' poultry might not have locus standi under this test. Later cases have followed the trend in Plaumann and in Toepfer v. Commission9 the applicant was held to be individually concerned, because the issue concerned only those importers, who applied for an import license particular day. 10. However in case Spijker Kwasten v. Commission11no individual concern was found because the court held that 'a decision addressed to certain Member States with the purpose of authorizing them not to apply community treatment for a fixed period to imports of products originating in a non - member country and in free circulation in the other Member States is not of individual concern to the only importer of the products in question established in the member states to which the decision is addressed since it concerns the importer merely by virtue of his objective status as an importer in the same manner as any other trader who is, or might be in the future, in the same situation'. In the light of the above discussion it can be concluded that where as France and .Jacques St Malo the Breton poultry farmer, who sent 2 tones of poultry to the UK in September would be able to claim based on the case law stated, Pierre St Michel and Sainsbury's Supermarkets have a thin chance of achieving this locus standi due to the strict application of the Plaumann test. PART B In case of challenging regulations it has been held that true regulations being normative acts are not open to individual challenge.12 In addition to showing direct and individual concern an individual applicant will also have to show that in substance the Regulation is really a decision or a bundle of decisions in order to challenge it .13 Therefore on the face of it none of the above parties should be able to gain locus standi.However the wording of Art 230 (4) indicates that individuals can challenge regulations which are in essence decisions. To do this the applicant will have to prove that the regulation is in fact a bundle of individual measures which are actually decisions with which he is directly and individually concerned. The Court has applied the closed category test and abstract terminology test in this regard e.g. in case International Fruit Company BV v. Commission14 where a group of importers of apples applied for an import license to the relevant national authorities and did the needful by informing the Commission who lay the rules for those applications. It was held that the regulation was applicable only to those who made import applications in the previous week.(and thus the measure was a bundle of individual decisions.) In the case of Calpak15 the court applied the abstract terminology test and held that , 'The nature of the measure as a regulation is not called in question by the mere fact that it is possible to determine the number or even identity of the producers to be granted the aid which is limited thereby'. 16 In the case of Codorniu17 regulation in dispute (which reserved the word "crmant" as a designation for certain sparkling wines produced in some regions of France and Luxembourg) was challenged by the applicant, who was a Spanish wine producer, had a trade mark including the word "crmant" for his products, registered since 1924. The Court held that in this case even though the measure was of a general legislative nature which concerned the traders in a general way, it did not prevent it from being of individual concern to the applicant .The court was of the opinion that Codorniu was affected because he had registered his trade mark and used it traditionally before and after the registration. Academic opinion has suggested that the willingness of the Court to allow private applicants to challenge true regulations (under the abstract approach) demonstrates a liberal trend by the court. 18Cases like Kik v. Counciland Commission 19 demonstrate a rather different approach where the applicant tried to challenge the language regime of the Council Regulation which established the(Community trademark and the Community trademark office) and excluded his Dutch language.He was refused locus standi and his application under Art 6 ECHR was also rejected.The court stated at this point that even the application of Article 6 does not preclude the rules for standing under Article 230 (4). However the case of Greenpeace20 followed the restrictive Plaumann approach and based on that it would seem that while Morgan Cheesemakers of Newport and Jenkins Dairies of Caerphilly who are listed in the appendix, would be able to bring an action ,it is unlikely that Llangloffan Plc., will be able to avail itself of this locus standi due to the restrictive nature of the Plaumann test. In my view then Morgan and Jenkins should both be able to use the approach of proving that the regulation is in fact a bundle of individual measures which are actually decisions with which they are directly and individually concerned. This is because on the face of it a regulation is not amenable to challenge per se as discussed above. Academics have argued for a long time that the time is definitely right for a change in the locus standi rules in an action for annulment of Community measures.21 This is because sometimes the application of the Plaumann test may make the whole procedure of gaining locus standi very restrictive and thus cause injustice to those affected.22 References 1. Steiner, EU Law, (OUP, 9th Ed, 2006) Ch 11. 2. Weatherill, Cases & Materials on EU Law, (OUP, 8th Ed. 2007) pp 211-228, 255-270. 3. Fairhurst, Law of the European Union, (Pearson/Longman, 2007) Ch 8. 4. Granger M. P., 'Towards a Liberalisation of Standing Conditions for Individuals Seeking Judicial Review of Community Acts: Jego et Cie SA v Commission and Union de Pequenos Agricultores v Council' [2003] 66 MLR 124 5. Arnull A., 'Private Applicants and the Action for Annulment since Codorniu' [2001] 38 CMLR 7. 6. Koch, 'Locus standi of private applicants under the EU Constitution: Preserving gaps in the protection of individuals' right to an effective remedy', [2005] 30 ELR 511. 7. Vogt, 'Indirect judicial protection in EC law - the case of the plea of illegality', [2006] 31 ELR 364 8. Jo Shaw, Law of the European Union, 3rd ed., Palgrave Law Masters, 2000, p.506, hereinafter Shaw 9. Paul Craig, 'Legality, Standing and Substantial Review in Community Law', 14 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1994, p.507. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Change in the Locus Standi Rules in an Action for Annulment of Research Paper”, n.d.)
Change in the Locus Standi Rules in an Action for Annulment of Research Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1526567-see-below-bachelor-essay
(Change in the Locus Standi Rules in an Action for Annulment of Research Paper)
Change in the Locus Standi Rules in an Action for Annulment of Research Paper. https://studentshare.org/law/1526567-see-below-bachelor-essay.
“Change in the Locus Standi Rules in an Action for Annulment of Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1526567-see-below-bachelor-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Change in the Locus Standi Rules in an Action for Annulment of Community Measures

Community Health Action and Health Development: Facing Challenges in Todays Age

hellip; It is said that since then, there has been no substantial survey of community workers.... The reason why the CHA is able to set a difference from past attempts on betterment of community life is its high reliance on people.... A question is laid to us about what community work is and perhaps, its current state in the UK.... In the past, community work was a staggering activity in the UK, dwelling in the youth work and adult education alone....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

The Commission proposes, the Council decides, the Court interprets

Finer aspects of the soft law and how it is applied to different communities and also to different groups in a community is discussed.... How can one define law The definition may differ from person to person, but we can all agree that it is one or more of the following: A set of rules that governs or binds a community, law is a means of resolution of disputes or conflicts, or a/the way of punishing offenders.... However, when it comes to a 'community' of different states coming together under one flag because of a common vision and mutual understanding for the purpose of furthering better understanding and friendship, developing and strengthening economic ties among the nations requires a separate mechanism or a governing system to ensure the smooth operation of such a 'union'....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

European Union Laws

Therefore, under EU laws it is possible for a party to “lodge a complaint with the Commission against a Member State for any measure (law, regulation or administrative action) or practice attributable to a Member State which they consider incompatible with a provision or a principle of community law.... ?? Conditions of a direct effect of directives: Therefore considering the First part of the question, it could be well within the prerogatives of EU laws for the members of the gardening club (directly affected) and the local residents (indirectly affected) to bring an action against UK government for violation of deemed European Commission directives....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Changes in Roles of African Women Triggered by Colonial Rule

Another change in the Kikuyu women was a change of roles.... ntroduction of Christianity:The first and foremost that the colonists brought about in women were change in beliefs.... This change of faith was spread through the colonies (Afrikan Eye, par....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The European Court of Justice

The court held that in order to bring an action for annulment,  the defendants must show that they are individually concerned and that the decision “affects them by reason of certain attributes which are peculiar to them or by reason of circumstances by which they are differentiated from all other persons….... This provides for annulment of illegal administrative action and it allows citizens and firms to proceed against decisions.... The open category has been specified which renders it next to impossible for an individual to win an action for an annulment because any decision with a future impact could be regarded as open and would, therefore, be unchallengeable....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Features and Cases of European Community Law

In the case of the United Kingdom of Great Britain v the Council of the European Union7, the UK Government brought an action for annulment of Article 1(2) of the Council Regulation (EC) no: 519/94, according to which rules were specified for imports from some third countries.... According to the Directive, certain exceptions were made for some countries in terms of quotas and surveillance measures that were applicable at community levels.... This coursework describes features and cases of European community Law....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework

Features of Community Development

The coursework "Features of community Development" is set to examine a community and the issues related to healthy living.... It is important to note that community action for health involves a number of factors geared towards a better society.... In simple terms, community action for health is where a group or groups of people with like minds recognize their common experiences in health issues and they come together in discussion and review of their common concerns (Burrows and Kendall 2003, p....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

Community, Change and Community Development

This literature review "community, Change and community Development" discusses community as a small or large social unit of people and things acquiring common attributes such as values, norms, religion, or even identity.... Therefore, the social ties help in defining community through sharing the same identity, and institutions as family, government, humanity, occupation, and society gives a greater outlook of common attributes or concept....
8 Pages (2000 words) Literature review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us