StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Doctrine of Binding Precedent in Australias Courts - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Doctrine of Binding Precedent in Australia’s Courts" is an outstanding example of a law case study. Donald James Gifford introduces the doctrine of binding precedent in the book chapter titled “The Doctrine of Precedent.” The doctrine of precedent states that whatever has been decided by superior courts should be regarded as law and binding to all courts until or unless overruled or altered by a higher court in the same hierarchy, or an Act of Parliament…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.2% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Doctrine of Binding Precedent in Australias Courts"

Name: Tutor: Course: Date: 1. Doctrine of Binding Precedent in Australia’s Courts Donald James Gifford introduces the doctrine of binding precedent in the book chapter titled “The Doctrine of Precedent.” The doctrine of precedent states that whatever has been decided by superior courts should be regarded as law and binding to all courts until or unless overruled or altered by a higher court in the same hierarchy, or an Act of Parliament. For instance, the State Supreme Courts abide by the verdict of the High Court of Australia even if they believe these decisions are wrong. However, the High Court of Australia has the legal right to review its own earlier decisions as deems fit (Gifford 56-62). The doctrine of precedent is of vital importance in the courts of Australia and other countries because it allows consistency and harmony in the society as all people regardless of age, background, creed or sex will be tried and judged in a court of law with justice and fairness. In application of doctrine of binding precedent, what should be considered is not the decision as a whole but the major principle of law, that is, the ratio decidendi, which is binding and applicable to other courts (Chiarella16). What the judge gives in his ruling that is not binding to other courts is known as obiter dicta (Brassil 27). There are two rules of precedent. A binding precedent is one in which lower courts are required to follow the decision of superior courts while in the persuasive precedent, superior courts are not required to follow resolutions from lower courts though they can use them to make decisions (Brassil 27). Most judges are moving to rulings that are strictly binding rather than persuasive because of the rapid social change in the society. The doctrine of precedent can be hazardous in that once this decision has been laid out, it is very difficult to remove or alter it regardless of rapid social change. However, it is the function of the judges to bring laws up to date with the expectations and needs of the society. One of the reasons why this is needed, according to Brassil is because of the change of circumstances in the community (27). However, this does not suggest a decrease in the use of precedent as a principle. In matters that need a clear distinction in a case, judicial precedent must be avoided. The judge has an obligation to show that precedent does not apply because the facts of the case are different. Secondly, a judge from a higher court can decide to reverse a ruling or decision that a lower court has passed when the party takes it for an appeal. In this case, the judge must prove its irregularity, overrule the lower court’s decision and pass a new precedent. Overruling is applied when two similar but separate cases have different ruling. For instance, in Case X at a lower court, a defendant was found guilty. A similar Case Y at a higher court, the defendant was acquitted based on the conclusion that the precedent of case X was wrong. It is therefore the responsibility of the judge to overrule this precedent and apply his own in Case Y. In High Court lawsuits such as Cullen v Trappell (1980) 54 ALJR 295, the court took precedence in a two year old decision in Atlas Tiles Ltd as erroneous (Bird 234). There are other instances where a decision is ignored and not overruled. In such matters, the judge of the higher court decides to disapprove the ruling and initiate his own precedent. Some people believe that the Doctrine of Precedent is rigid and therefore unfit for a changing and advancing society. Others see the need for judges to be creative in their rulings. Judicial creativity allows judges to adapt the law to a modern society. The use of judicial creativity is linked to precedent in that it avails new precedents to the existing ones (Bird 234). There must be careful consideration when judges use judicial creativity because they are not only providing solutions to disputes, but they are also shaping the law for the future. Along this line, Gibbs said that once the most cautious and courteous deliberation on earlier decisions has been made, and after giving due weight to all situation, a Justice may bestow effect to his own judgment in preference to an earlier verdict of the court (Lauterpacht and Greenwood 731). The disadvantage of using judicial creativity is the fact that unlike parliament, courts do not have advisory committees. In addition, they are not accountable to the decisions that they make. The solution is in parliament where they can check the inconsistency and overrule the decision according to the provisions of the constitution (Malcolm 47). In view of this, Lord Gardiner said in London Tramways Co. v. London City Council [1898] AC 375 said that justices regard the use of precedent as a crucial foundation upon which to make decisions over what is the law and its relevance to individual cases. In addition, it provides at least some degree of conviction upon which people can rely in the carrying out of their affairs, as well as a basis for a methodical growth of legal rules' (Slapper and Kelly 81). Statutes or Acts of parliament are passed by the federal or state parliament. These acts go through stages until they later receive the Royal Ascent to become law. This law is binding to its citizens. In Australia and other countries, these acts of parliament can be challenged when they offend or contradict the constitution. It is therefore the responsibility of the High Court to safeguard the interests of the people by ensuring that these legislations comply with the constitution, its provisions and limitations. In conclusion, Donald James Gifford literature argues that it must emphasized that the main aim of courts of whatever status is not to develop the law in general, but to find a just solution to a disputes between the parties in particular case. It is the responsibility of the judiciary to safeguard laws that are just, equal and binding to all citizens. The citizens of a country must be able to trust their judges in their efforts to implement the law so as to discourage them from taking the law into their own hands. References Bird, G. The Process of Law in Australia. Sydney: Butterworths, 1988. Brassil, Belinda. Excel Preliminary Legal Studies. Australia: Pascal Press, 2000. Gifford, Donald. Understanding the Australian Legal System .Australia: Routledge, 1997. Lauterpacht, Elihu and Greenwood, C. J. International Law Reports. Cambridge University Press, 1999. Malcolm, D. ‘High Court and Democracy’ The West Australian. Sydney: Butterworths, 1994. Slapper, Gary & Kelly, David. The English legal system. (7th ed.) London: Routledge Cavendish, 2004 2. The Key to Agency is Policy Agencies act on behalf of either the government or institutions by implementing the decisions that they have made. The main function of an agency is to act on behalf of its principle whether it is the government or an institution. There are clear guidelines that define the objectives, responsibilities and goals of an agency and these are defined by the principle before the formation of an agency and during its functioning. In government, agencies are formed to address particular issues in the society. These include things like security, energy and the environment. These agencies implement decisions made by the government on specific items. An agency on security will address security issues and that on energy or environment will tackle corresponding issues depending on the guidelines it has been given. Within government policies are the guidelines that dictate the responsibilities, functions or work that a particular agency will carry out. It is therefore important to note what public policies are and why they are at the core of the working of agencies. Public policies are policies made by the government to address societal issues. What is a public policy? Gerston defines public policy as an amalgamation of decisions, commitments and actions made by people who hold or influence government posts of authority (7). Public policies are made as resolutions by the government in response to the needs of the public. Public policies are an outcome of the association between politics and government. They therefore are vital in defining the existing values and offering solutions to existing problems. Agencies need clear guidelines to define what their mandates are and these clear guidelines form the basis of operation for the agencies. Agencies are implementers of public policies and without these policies agencies are rendered useless. In the society several agencies can be placed to address the same fundamental issue, for example security, and this sometime leads to agencies having a conflict because of their mandates in the society. Clearly defined policies will avoid such conflicts because they will be able to define exactly what needs to implemented and this will act as a guidance as to which agency should implement it (Sabatier 10-11). A breakdown in policymaking and interpretation normally leads to a breakdown in the implementation work done by agencies. Policies determine how agencies are formed, their function and work that they carry out. This means that they are at the centre of agencies. When an agency is seen not to be effectively carrying out its function then it is important to look at the policies to determine where the problem is. Yanow argues that in order for an agency to effectively implement its duties, it must early on create its own identity and image internally and externally in order to communicate policy meanings to its intended audience or readers (19) Policy therefore forms the blueprint for agency formation and functioning. An effective agency is one that can effectively implement policies that it was formed to address and this makes policy the core and key of agency. References Yanow, Dvora. How does a policy mean? : interpreting policy and organizational actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1996. Gerston, Larry, N. Public policy making: process and principles. New York: M.E Sharpe, 2004. Sabatier, Paul, A. Theories of the policy process: Theoretical lenses on public policy. New York: Westview Press, 1999. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Doctrine of Binding Precedent in Australias Courts Case Study, n.d.)
Doctrine of Binding Precedent in Australias Courts Case Study. https://studentshare.org/law/2077001-two-essays-one-is-a-1000-word-essay-the-second-is-a-500-word-essay
(Doctrine of Binding Precedent in Australias Courts Case Study)
Doctrine of Binding Precedent in Australias Courts Case Study. https://studentshare.org/law/2077001-two-essays-one-is-a-1000-word-essay-the-second-is-a-500-word-essay.
“Doctrine of Binding Precedent in Australias Courts Case Study”. https://studentshare.org/law/2077001-two-essays-one-is-a-1000-word-essay-the-second-is-a-500-word-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Doctrine of Binding Precedent in Australias Courts

Doctrine of Judicial Precedence and Statutory Interpretation in England and Wales

This essay "doctrine of Judicial Precedence and Statutory Interpretation in England and Wales" focuses on Judicial precedence and statutory interpretation are an integral part of the application of law in both England and Wales for the determination of points of law.... The presentation of cases with unique characteristics that may not allow the application of the doctrine of judicial precedence has also made the legislature ensure that the laws are tailored to meet the current circumstances....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Do Statutes Tame Doctrine of Precedent

However, the laws based on the doctrine of precedent or case laws edge over the statutory laws, because of its simplicity in its application facilitating decisions on a case by the jury.... The Law making power is vested with the Federal government as well as the state governments The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty demands that nobody can annul a law promulgated by the parliament, whereas, common law can be changed through... hp, viewed on 9th May, 2009)History of Case Law and the guiding PrinciplesAccording to Baker, 'A precedent is a decision or judgment of a court, which is used as authority for reaching the same decision in subsequent cases....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Doctrine of Precedent can be considered both a Blessing and a Curse

There are many convincing arguments both for and against the use of the Doctrine of precedent in Australia.... Within this essay, the history of the doctrine of Precedent will be outlined, there will be references to two preceding cases, relevant terms will be defined and the advantages and disadvantages of the doctrine of Precedent as a basis for common law will be argued.... This is collectively known as the 'doctrine of Precedent'....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent

Many a legal theorists and commentators have agreed upon the view that the sophistication of the English legal system cannot be understood without grasping the centrality of the doctrine of judicial precedent in it.... The present study is a work on particular jurisprudence since it seeks the correct positioning of the doctrine of judicial precedent within the English legal system.... The doctrine of judicial precedent has undergone profound transformations from Eighteenth century onwards in accordance with the changing world....
26 Pages (6500 words) Thesis

Case Law Study in Ratio Decidendi

Then the all important doctrine of ratio decidendi is discussed and its identification in this particular case is done.... Next, the importance of the doctrine of precedent is discussed.... Then the hierarchy of courts in Australia and the difference between binding and persuasive effects is discussed. ... fter this the type of effect that this case has on the Magistrates' courts of Queensland is discussed and explained....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Doctrine of Precedent

English judge, Baron Parke, enunciated this theory of binding stare decisis, in 1833.... This paper "doctrine of Precedent" discusses the doctrine of precedent's role in the English legal system as very important since common law is a vital basis of law in the English legal system.... The doctrine of precedent is defined as 'The common law principle which binds a judge or a magistrate to follow a previous similar decision of higher courts in the same hierarchy; also known as stare decisis' (Vickery & Pendleton 2006), which implies the decision stands....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Doctrine of Precedent

This report "Doctrine of Precedent" focuses on the doctrine of precedent in English law that encompasses two closely connected ideas.... precedent in its narrow sense, or the doctrine of stare decisis, denotes that the courts of appeal, in the normal course, consider themselves bound by their own rulings.... For instance, a lower court faced with binding precedent may be compelled to decide on the basis of a rule that is unjust in the opinion of the judge....
8 Pages (2000 words) Report

Kyle and George and Delicious Hamburgers Issue

contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties, a breach of which entitles the innocent party to sue for damages or any other remedies.... The paper "Kyle and George and Delicious Hamburgers Issue" is a perfect example of a law assignment.... The issues for determination, in this case, are; whether there was an element of the agreement for the formation of a contract and secondly whether Delicious Hamburgers (DH) are obliged to provide Kyle and George with Mazda CX-7 each....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us