StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Human Rights and English Law - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Human Rights and English Law" it is clear that generally, the freedom of expression is a fundamental human right whose existence is necessary for individuals to exercise other freedoms, as well as participate in the political process…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.1% of users find it useful
Human Rights and English Law
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Human Rights and English Law"

Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Freedoms (hereinafter “ECHR recognises the freedom of expression as among the human rights whose protection must be guaranteed. Through the Human Rights Act 1998 (hereinafter “HRA”), freedom of expression, alongside other ECHR rights, was recognised as a fundamental right, guaranteeing protection within the United Kingdom, giving it a degree of immunity from state suppression and regulation. However, whereas the significance of the freedom of expression as a fundamental human right requiring protection is not questioned, the degree of immunity accorded to it is a frequently debated issue insofar as restrictions regarding its protection are concerned, challenging its character as a fundamental right. Given the issues surrounding the freedom of expression, this essay will therefore argue that the freedom of expression is a fundamental human right, whose protection, although guaranteed, is not absolute such that restrictions must be placed to ensure that its exercise is in accordance with the laws of the land and the responsibilities required of citizens. The freedom of expression is recognised as among the “human rights and fundamental freedoms [that are] the birthright of all human beings” (cited in Smith, 2004, p. 1). Its fundamental character lies in its significance as a pillar of democratic society, and as a human right intimately connected with the exercise of individual life and liberty. As illustrated in Handyside v. United Kingdom1, the “[f]reedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of [a democratic] society, one of the basic conditions for its progress and for the development of every man”, such that its protection is extended “not only to ‘information’ or ‘ideas’ that are favourably received or regarded as inoffensive or as a matter of indifference, but also to those that offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population.” Hence, freedom of expression is a fundamental right, whose exercise is necessary for citizens to participate in the democratic process and the functioning of society (Stone, 2004, p.1). On the other hand, the freedom of expression is also a human right whose exercise directly affects other fundamental human rights as recognised by the ECHR. Whereas Article 9 of the ECHR recognises the freedom of religion, the exercise of such freedom is incomplete if individuals are restricted in their expression of religious beliefs. Freedom of expression is therefore fundamental as a political right and in ensuring that individuals enjoy personal freedoms. The freedom of expression however has been dubbed as a “liberal puzzle”, such that while the need to protect it is well established, there is an ensuing debate regarding the scope of its protection (Barendt, 2005, p. 1). Hence, the ECHR distinguishes between absolute human rights whose protection is unimpeachable regardless of the surrounding circumstances and conditional human rights whose protection is restricted by certain limitations. With respect to the freedom of expression, limitations are delineated in paragraph 2 of Article 10, which recognises the duties and responsibilities attached to the freedom of expression such that its protection is subject to conditions “prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society”. Hence, violations of the freedom of expression can therefore be justified insofar as it is in accordance with the law and necessary for a democratic society. The freedom of expression as a conditional right however, should not be misconstrued as diminishing its fundamental character. Instead, it only illustrates that among the fundamental human rights recognised in the ECHR, a hierarchy of rights exists where violating some rights can be justified. However, because States differ on matters such as moral values, culture, and a sense of fairness, the ECHR provides a certain “margin of appreciation”, such that in guaranteeing protection for human rights, they are given the prerogative to set restrictions on conditional rights, including the freedom of expression. Regarding restrictions under British law, Lord Hoffman emphasises in Campbell (Appellant) v MGN Limited (Respondents), the need to balance between conflicting interests by “[focusing] on the comparative importance of the specific rights being claimed in the individual case”.2 To determine this balance, Lord Nicholls in Regina v. British Broadcasting Corporation (Appellants) ex parte Prolife Alliance (Respondents)3 comments that restrictions to the freedom of expression must consider the type of speech in question such that between the “freedom of political speech and the protection of the public from being unduly distressed in their own homes” for example, protecting public interest must prevail over the freedom of speech. The same restriction is applied in the case of R v Stephane Laurent Perrin4 to obscene publications, which can harm the public by corrupting the minds of individuals. The case of A v B PLC (Sub Nom Garry Flitcroft v Mirror Group Newspapers)5, on the other hand, illustrates that an individual’s freedom of expression may be restricted to prevent breaches of confidence between individuals in special relationship as exemplified by the injunction aimed at preventing Flitcroft’s previous partners from exposing their private affair in public. Moreover, such privacy is not limited to relationships between private individuals, but as well as relationships arising from official duties as illustrated in Regina (Appellant) v Shayler (On Appeal From The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))6 which prevents the disclosure of documents in the interest of national security. The restriction however, was further strengthened in Venables v News Group Newspapers Ltd, which held that “there is no longer a necessary element of the confidentiality cause of action that the information arises from a confidential relationship if there was a real and strong possibility of serious physical harm and death” (cited in Rozenberg, 2004, p.34). The concept of harm however is not limited to the possibility of physical harm or death. Instead, English law also recognises the defamation of character as possible justifications for restricting the freedom of expression. Hence, restrictions are therefore imposed to prohibit individuals from expressing defamatory false statements of fact; or statements of opinion that are not based on facts, not within the public interest, and unfair (Young, 2000, pp. 90-91). Thus, the restrictions under English law are legally justified given that in balancing infringements on the freedom of expression with the need to protect the rights and interests of individuals and the public at large, as well as the need to prevent breaches in confidence, especially when arising from a relationship, which is crucial for the State’s security, such restrictions are in accordance with the legitimate aims of paragraph 2 under Article 10 of the ECHR. It should be noted, however, that while the restrictions on the freedom of expression within English law can be justified, its application insofar as judicial interpretation are concerned leaves much room for debate, where unjustified restrictions may persist. Hence, the new rules on statutory interpretation provided by Article 3 of the HRA, which states “[s]o far as possible to do so, [legislation] should be read and given effect in a way which is compatible with Convention rights” and Article 4, which allows courts to invoke a “declaration of incompatibility”; potentially allows courts to defer from providing judgments to reverse unjustified restrictions for difficult cases. Furthermore, some scholars are correct to be “sceptical” of certain rights embodied in the Act, where in the case of freedom of expression, human rights law seem to have diminished the relationship between citizens and the state to one where the state’s welfare in terms of security, may always prevail over individual rights (Tomkins, 2001, p.8). The freedom of expression is therefore a fundamental human right whose existence is necessary for individuals to exercise other freedoms, as well as participate in the political process. However, despite its importance, the freedom of expression is not an absolute right, such that it can be justifiably restricted by states, insofar as the restrictions are in accordance with the criteria provided by the ECHR. In this respect, the restrictions within English law can be justified on the basis of protecting the rights and interests of individuals, groups, and the state. It should be noted, however, that the protection of the freedom of expression, insofar as the English legal system is concerned, does not guarantee that all infringements cannot be remedied and compensated, especially in difficult cases where court judges can refuse to interpret legislation compliant with the ECHR. References Cases Handyside v. United Kingdom 5493/72 [1976] ECHR 5. Campbell (Appellant) v MGN Limited (Respondents) [2005] UKHL 61. Regina v. British Broadcasting Corporation (Appellants) ex parte Prolife Alliance (Respondents) [2003] UKHL 23. R v Stephane Laurent Perrin [2002] EWCA Crim 747. A v B PLC (Sub Nom Garry Flitcroft v Mirror Group Newspapers) [2002] 1 FLR. Regina (Appellant) v Shayler (On Appeal From The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) [2002] UKHL 11. Venables v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [2001] ICHRL 3. Primary Legislation European Convention on Human Rights and Freedoms 1950 Human Rights Act 1998. Secondary Materials Stone, R. (2004). Textbook on Civil Liberties and Human Rights, London: Oxford University Press. Young, A. (2000). “Fact, Opinion, and the Human Rights Act: Does English Law Need to Modify its Definition of ‘Statements of Opinion’ to Ensure compliance with Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (10)1, 89-107. Tomkins, A. (2001). Introduction: On Being Sceptical about Human Rights. In T. Campbell, K.D. Ewing, and A. Tomkins (Eds.), Sceptical Essay on Human Rights, London: Oxford University Press. Barendt, E. (2005). Freedom of Speech, (2nd Ed.), London: Oxford University Press. Smith, R.K.M. (2004). Textbook on Human Rights, (2nd Ed.), London: Oxford University Press. Rozenberg, J. (2004). Privacy and the Press. London: Oxford University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Human Rights and English law (LLB), Discuss why it is that freedom of Essay”, n.d.)
Human Rights and English law (LLB), Discuss why it is that freedom of Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1536138-human-rights-and-english-law-llb-discuss-why-it-is-that-freedom-of-expression-is-widely-considered-to-be-a-fundamental-human-right-and-the-extent-if-any-t
(Human Rights and English Law (LLB), Discuss Why It Is That Freedom of Essay)
Human Rights and English Law (LLB), Discuss Why It Is That Freedom of Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1536138-human-rights-and-english-law-llb-discuss-why-it-is-that-freedom-of-expression-is-widely-considered-to-be-a-fundamental-human-right-and-the-extent-if-any-t.
“Human Rights and English Law (LLB), Discuss Why It Is That Freedom of Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1536138-human-rights-and-english-law-llb-discuss-why-it-is-that-freedom-of-expression-is-widely-considered-to-be-a-fundamental-human-right-and-the-extent-if-any-t.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Human Rights and English Law

Human Rights - The Enforced Disappearance

3 Pages (750 words) Case Study

Human Rights and English Law - Without Security There Can Be No Liberty

??Citizens should have statutory rights to enforce their human rights in the UK courts.... We will by statute incorporate the European Convention on human rights into UK law to bring these rights home and allow our people access to them in their national courts.... The incorporation of the European Convention will establish a floor, not a ceiling, for human rights.... rosion of human rights started with the fight against terrorism....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Law: Civil Liberties and Human Rights

There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others ... When two young law partners, Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis, wrote a piece on ‘Right to Privacy' in 1890,1 they wouldn't have contemplated that they were setting in motion a process which would ultimately culminate in a whole new branch of law of torts and would....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

Individual Rights under the Human Rights Act

he English courts have to follow the decisions of the European Court of human rights and interpret them in the cases coming before them.... Despite this, the people have individual rights, and Britain has a long-standing tradition, whereby the rights and civil liberties of UK citizens have been accorded protection.... In the absence of a written constitution, the Human Rights Act protects the fundamental rights and civil liberties.... The first part of these Articles established the rights and the second part deals with the limitations of these rights....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 on English Law

The United Kingdom enacted the Human Rights Act 1998 to incorporate the provisions of the 1950 European Convention for the Protection of human rights and Fundamental Freedoms into its national law.... Judges are required to maintain a balance between the rights and the responsibilities of individuals with regard to their commercial interests.... The rights and freedoms of people belonging to other religions have to be respected.... However, in the wake of the HRA, employers would have to be more cautious in their dealings with their employees (human rights Act takes effect, 2000)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Human Rights Act 1998 and Its Impacts on English Law and Its Influence on Business

handler and Waud (2003) stated that The Human Rights Act 1998 gives 'further effect' to the rights and freedom that are guaranteed to all citizens by European Convention on human rights and Fundamental Freedom.... This paper "The Human Rights Act 1998 and Its Impacts on english law and Its Influence on Business" discusses the influences of the Human Rights Act on the business environment based on sources of english law and European Court of Human Rights cases....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Human Rights and the Privacy law

The writer of the present essay "human rights and the Privacy law" intends to examine the Human Rights Act of 1998.... rivacy and freedom of speech are important human rights that have not been strongly protected in english law.... The human rights Act is composed of sections that have the effect of codifying the European Convention on human rights protections into UK law.... human rights are known to be the moral principles that set out standards of human behavior and are regularly protected as legal rights in either the national or international law....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on English Law

For the first time, the UK implemented a piece of legislation akin to a constitutional Bill of Rights, protecting essential human rights and freedoms2.... Tis paper "The Impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on english law" focuses on the fact that the implementation of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) was heralded by the Lord Chancellor as having 'a profound and beneficial effect on our system of law and government'.... The HRA incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into the UK law and the preamble to the HRA states that its purpose is to 'give further effect to rights and freedoms"....
14 Pages (3500 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us